Ofstead Cori L, Buro Brandy L, Hopkins Krystina M, Eiland John E, Wetzler Harry P, Lichtenstein David R
Ofstead & Associates, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota, United States.
Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2020 Dec;8(12):E1769-E1781. doi: 10.1055/a-1264-7173. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
Recent outbreaks of duodenoscope-associated multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) have brought attention to the infection risk from procedures performed with duodenoscopes. Prior to these MDRO outbreaks, procedures with duodenoscopes were considered safe and low risk for exogenous infection transmission, provided they were performed in strict accordance with manufacturer instructions for use and multisociety reprocessing guidelines. The attention and efforts of the scientific community, regulatory agencies, and the device industry have deepened our understanding of factors responsible for suboptimal outcomes. These include instrument design, reprocessing practices, and surveillance strategies for detecting patient and instrument colonization. Various investigations have made it clear that current reprocessing methods fail to consistently deliver a pathogen-free instrument. The magnitude of infection transmission has been underreported due to several factors. These include the types of organisms responsible for infection, clinical signs presenting in sites distant from ERCP inoculation, and long latency from the time of acquisition to infection. Healthcare providers remain hampered by the ill-defined infectious risk innate to the current instrument design, contradictory information and guidance, and limited evidence-based interventions or reprocessing modifications that reduce risk. Therefore, the objectives of this narrative review included identifying outbreaks described in the peer-reviewed literature and comparing the findings with infections reported elsewhere. Search strategies included accessing peer-reviewed articles, governmental databases, abstracts for scientific conferences, and media reports describing outbreaks. This review summarizes current knowledge, highlights gaps in traditional sources of evidence, and explores opportunities to improve our understanding of actual risk and evidence-based approaches to mitigate risk.
近期与十二指肠镜相关的多重耐药菌(MDROs)暴发事件,已引发了人们对十二指肠镜操作所致感染风险的关注。在这些MDROs暴发事件之前,只要严格按照制造商的使用说明和多学会再处理指南进行操作,十二指肠镜检查被认为是安全的,且外源性感染传播风险较低。科学界、监管机构和器械行业的关注与努力,加深了我们对导致欠佳结果的因素的理解。这些因素包括器械设计、再处理操作以及检测患者和器械定植的监测策略。多项调查已明确表明,当前的再处理方法无法始终如一地提供无病原体器械。由于多种因素,感染传播的程度一直未得到充分报告。这些因素包括引起感染的生物体类型、远离ERCP接种部位出现的临床症状,以及从感染获取到发病的较长潜伏期。医疗保健提供者仍然受到当前器械设计固有的感染风险定义不明确、相互矛盾的信息和指导,以及减少风险的循证干预措施或再处理改进措施有限的阻碍。因此,本叙述性综述的目的包括识别同行评审文献中描述的暴发事件,并将研究结果与其他地方报告的感染情况进行比较。检索策略包括查阅同行评审文章、政府数据库、科学会议摘要以及描述暴发事件的媒体报道。本综述总结了当前的知识,突出了传统证据来源中的差距,并探索了改善我们对实际风险的理解以及基于证据的降低风险方法的机会。