Cho Jongmin, Gonzalez-Lepera Carlos, Manohar Nivedh, Kerr Matthew, Krishnan Sunil, Cho Sang Hyun
Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Mar 21;61(6):2562-81. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/6/2562. Epub 2016 Mar 8.
Some investigators have shown tumor cell killing enhancement in vitro and tumor regression in mice associated with the loading of gold nanoparticles (GNPs) before proton treatments. Several Monte Carlo (MC) investigations have also demonstrated GNP-mediated proton dose enhancement. However, further studies need to be done to quantify the individual physical factors that contribute to the dose enhancement or cell-kill enhancement (or radiosensitization). Thus, the current study investigated the contributions of particle-induced x-ray emission (PIXE), particle-induced gamma-ray emission (PIGE), Auger and secondary electrons, and activation products towards the total dose enhancement. Specifically, GNP-mediated dose enhancement was measured using strips of radiochromic film that were inserted into vials of cylindrical GNPs, i.e. gold nanorods (GNRs), dispersed in a saline solution (0.3 mg of GNRs/g or 0.03% of GNRs by weight), as well as vials containing water only, before proton irradiation. MC simulations were also performed with the tool for particle simulation code using the film measurement setup. Additionally, a high-purity germanium detector system was used to measure the photon spectrum originating from activation products created from the interaction of protons and spherical GNPs present in a saline solution (20 mg of GNPs/g or 2% of GNPs by weight). The dose enhancement due to PIXE/PIGE recorded on the films in the GNR-loaded saline solution was less than the experimental uncertainty of the film dosimetry (<2%). MC simulations showed highly localized dose enhancement (up to a factor 17) in the immediate vicinity (<100 nm) of GNRs, compared with hypothetical water nanorods (WNRs), mostly due to GNR-originated Auger/secondary electrons; however, the average dose enhancement over the entire GNR-loaded vial was found to be minimal (0.1%). The dose enhancement due to the activation products from GNPs was minimal (<0.1%) as well. In conclusion, under the currently investigated conditions that are considered clinically relevant, PIXE, PIGE, and activation products contribute minimally to GNP/GNR-mediated proton dose enhancement, whereas Auger/secondary electrons contribute significantly but only at short distances (<100 nm) from GNPs/GNRs.
一些研究人员已经表明,在质子治疗前加载金纳米颗粒(GNP)与体外肿瘤细胞杀伤增强以及小鼠体内肿瘤消退有关。几项蒙特卡罗(MC)研究也证明了GNP介导的质子剂量增强。然而,需要进一步研究来量化导致剂量增强或细胞杀伤增强(或放射增敏)的各个物理因素。因此,当前的研究调查了粒子诱导X射线发射(PIXE)、粒子诱导γ射线发射(PIGE)、俄歇电子和二次电子以及活化产物对总剂量增强的贡献。具体而言,在质子辐照前,使用插入装有分散在盐溶液(0.3 mg金纳米棒/g或0.03%重量的金纳米棒)中的圆柱形GNP(即金纳米棒,GNR)小瓶以及仅装有水的小瓶中的放射变色薄膜条来测量GNP介导的剂量增强。还使用粒子模拟代码工具根据薄膜测量设置进行了MC模拟。此外,使用高纯锗探测器系统测量由质子与存在于盐溶液(20 mg GNP/g或2%重量的GNP)中的球形GNP相互作用产生的活化产物产生的光子光谱。在装有GNR的盐溶液中薄膜上记录的由于PIXE/PIGE导致的剂量增强小于薄膜剂量测定的实验不确定度(<2%)。与假设的水纳米棒(WNR)相比,MC模拟显示在GNR紧邻区域(<100 nm)内有高度局部化的剂量增强(高达17倍),这主要归因于源自GNR的俄歇电子/二次电子;然而,发现在整个装有GNR的小瓶中的平均剂量增强很小(0.1%)。由于GNP的活化产物导致的剂量增强也很小(<0.1%)。总之,在目前被认为与临床相关的研究条件下,PIXE、PIGE和活化产物对GNP/GNR介导的质子剂量增强贡献最小,而俄歇电子/二次电子贡献显著,但仅在距GNP/GNR短距离(<100 nm)处。