Suppr超能文献

美国当代疑似中风患者的院前紧急医疗服务响应时间

Contemporary Prehospital Emergency Medical Services Response Times for Suspected Stroke in the United States.

作者信息

Schwartz Jennifer, Dreyer Rachel P, Murugiah Karthik, Ranasinghe Isuru

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016 Sep-Oct;20(5):560-5. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2016.1139219. Epub 2016 Mar 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There are no contemporary national-level data on Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response times for suspected stroke in the United States (US). Because effective stroke treatment is time-dependent, we characterized response times for suspected stroke, and examined whether they met guideline recommendations.

METHODS

Using the National EMS Information System dataset, we included 911 calls for patients ≥ 18 years with an EMS provider impression of stroke. We examined variation in the total EMS response time by dispatch notification of stroke, age, sex, race, region, time of day, day of the week, as well as the proportion of EMS responses that met guideline recommended response times. Total EMS response time included call center dispatch time (receipt of call by dispatch to EMS being notified), EMS dispatch time (dispatch informing EMS to EMS starts moving), time to scene (EMS starts moving to EMS arrival on scene), time on scene (EMS arrival on scene to EMS leaving scene), and transport time (EMS leaving scene to reaching treatment facility).

RESULTS

We identified 184,179 events with primary impressions of stroke (mean age 70.4 ± 16.4 years, 55% male). Median total EMS response time was 36 (IQR 28.7-48.0) minutes. Longer response times were observed for patients aged 65-74 years, of white race, females, and from non-urban areas. Dispatch identification of stroke versus "other" was associated with marginally faster response times (36.0 versus 36.7 minutes, p < 0.01). When compared to recommended guidelines, 78% of EMS responses met dispatch delay of <1 minute, 72% met time to scene of <8 minutes, and 46% met on-scene time of <15 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

In the United States, time from receipt of 9-1-1 calls to treatment center arrival takes a median of 36 minutes for stroke patients, an improvement upon previously published times. The fact that 22%-46% of EMS responses did not meet stroke guidelines highlights an opportunity for improvement. Future studies should examine EMS diagnostic accuracy nationally or regionally using outcomes based approaches, as accurate recognition of prehospital strokes is vital in order to improve response times, adhere to guidelines, and ultimately provide timely and effective stroke treatment.

摘要

背景与目的

在美国,目前尚无关于疑似中风患者的紧急医疗服务(EMS)响应时间的国家级数据。由于有效的中风治疗依赖于时间,我们对疑似中风的响应时间进行了特征描述,并检查其是否符合指南建议。

方法

使用国家EMS信息系统数据集,我们纳入了对年龄≥18岁且EMS提供者怀疑为中风的患者的911呼叫记录。我们研究了中风的调度通知、年龄、性别、种族、地区、一天中的时间、一周中的日期等因素对EMS总响应时间的影响,以及符合指南推荐响应时间的EMS响应比例。EMS总响应时间包括呼叫中心调度时间(调度接到呼叫到通知EMS的时间)、EMS调度时间(调度通知EMS到EMS开始出动的时间)、到达现场时间(EMS开始出动到EMS到达现场的时间)、在现场时间(EMS到达现场到EMS离开现场的时间)以及转运时间(EMS离开现场到到达治疗机构的时间)。

结果

我们确定了184,179例主要诊断为中风的事件(平均年龄70.4±16.4岁,55%为男性)。EMS总响应时间的中位数为36(四分位间距28.7 - 48.0)分钟。65 - 74岁、白人、女性以及来自非城市地区的患者响应时间较长。调度识别为中风与“其他”相比,响应时间略快(36.0对36.7分钟,p < 0.01)。与推荐指南相比,78%的EMS响应满足调度延迟<1分钟,72%满足到达现场时间<8分钟,46%满足在现场时间<15分钟。

结论

在美国,中风患者从接到911呼叫到到达治疗中心的时间中位数为36分钟,较之前公布的时间有所改善。22% - 46%的EMS响应未达到中风指南标准这一事实凸显了改进的机会。未来的研究应使用基于结果的方法在全国或地区范围内检查EMS的诊断准确性,因为准确识别院前中风对于改善响应时间、遵循指南并最终提供及时有效的中风治疗至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验