Mould-Millman Nee-Kofi, Meese Halea, Alattas Ibthial, Ido Moges, Yi Iasson, Oyewumi Tolulope, Colman Michael, Frankel Michael, Yancey Arthur
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):734-742. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2018.1447620. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
Strokes are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, especially in the "stroke belt" of the southeast. Up to 65% of stroke patients access care by calling 9-1-1. The primary objective of this study is to measure the accuracy of emergency medical dispatchers (EMD) and paramedics, in the prehospital identification of stroke.
The study was based at Grady Emergency Medical Services, which is Atlanta, Georgia's public emergency medical services (EMS) provider. A retrospective analysis of all medically related 9-1-1 calls to Grady EMS classified as "stroke" between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2012 was performed. A database was created using deterministic linkage between records from Grady EMS, Grady Hospital Emergency Department (ED), and the Grady Hospital Stroke Registry. Patients excluded were less than 18 years of age, had previous or concurrent head injuries, were transferred from another inpatient facility, and/or had incomplete patient records in any one of the three databases. Descriptive analysis, linear regression, and logistic multivariable regression were performed to discover the accuracy of stroke identification and contributory prehospital factors.
A total of 548 patients were included: 475 were transported with EMS impression of stroke and 73 with an impression other than stroke. The median age was 59 years, 87.4% were black, and 52.6% were female. Paramedics adhered to all seven elements of the Grady EMS stroke protocol in 76.4% (n = 363) of suspected stroke cases. Sensitivity and positive predictive value for paramedic stroke identification was 76.2% and 49.3%, respectively, and for EMD, was 48.9% and 24%, respectively. Identification of hemorrhagic strokes had a relatively lower sensitivity. Paramedics were more likely to positively identify strokes when the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) screen was positive, or when classified by EMD as stroke. Paramedics were less likely to identify stroke in female patients. Paramedics' diagnostic accuracy was similar regardless of their adherence to the EMS stroke care protocol.
EMD and EMS personnel in a large city in the Southeastern United States, with high stroke prevalence, had a relatively high sensitivity in identifying acute stroke patients. Paramedic accuracy was augmented by positive CPSS screening and by EMD recognition of stroke.
在美国,中风是发病和死亡的主要原因,尤其在东南部的“中风带”。高达65%的中风患者通过拨打911获得救治。本研究的主要目的是衡量紧急医疗调度员(EMD)和护理人员在院前识别中风方面的准确性。
该研究以格雷迪紧急医疗服务中心为基础,其是佐治亚州亚特兰大市的公共紧急医疗服务(EMS)提供商。对2012年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间拨打给格雷迪EMS且归类为“中风”的所有与医疗相关的911呼叫进行回顾性分析。通过将格雷迪EMS、格雷迪医院急诊科(ED)和格雷迪医院中风登记处的记录进行确定性关联创建了一个数据库。被排除的患者包括年龄小于18岁、有既往或并发头部损伤、从另一家住院机构转来以及/或者在这三个数据库中的任何一个中患者记录不完整的情况。进行描述性分析、线性回归和逻辑多变量回归以发现中风识别的准确性和院前相关因素。
共纳入548例患者:475例被EMS诊断为中风并转运,73例诊断为非中风。中位年龄为59岁,87.4%为黑人,52.6%为女性。在76.4%(n = 363)的疑似中风病例中,护理人员遵循了格雷迪EMS中风方案的所有七个要素。护理人员识别中风的敏感性和阳性预测值分别为76.2%和49.3%,EMD的分别为48.9%和24%。出血性中风的识别敏感性相对较低。当辛辛那提前院中风量表(CPSS)筛查呈阳性或被EMD归类为中风时,护理人员更有可能正确识别中风。护理人员在女性患者中识别中风的可能性较小。无论护理人员是否遵循EMS中风护理方案,其诊断准确性相似。
在美国东南部一个中风患病率高的大城市中,EMD和EMS人员在识别急性中风患者方面具有相对较高的敏感性。CPSS筛查呈阳性以及EMD对中风的识别提高了护理人员的准确性。