Vuorinen Pauli, Setälä Piritta, Ollikainen Jyrki, Hoppu Sanna
Emergency Medical Services, Centre for Prehospital Emergency Care, Pirkanmaa wellbeing services county, Tampere, Finland.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00931-0.
Mechanical thrombectomy is the treatment of choice for large vessel occlusion strokes done only in comprehensive stroke centres (CSC). We investigated whether the transportation time of thrombectomy candidates from another hospital district could be reduced by using an ambulance and a helicopter and how this affected their recovery.
We prospectively gathered the time points of thrombectomy candidates referred to the Tampere University Hospital from the hospital district of Southern Ostrobothnia. Primary and secondary transports were included. In Hybrid transport, the helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) unit flew from an airport near the CSC to meet the patient during transport and continued the transport to definitive care. Ground transport was chosen only when the weather prevented flying, or the HEMS crew was occupied in another emergency. We contacted the patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy 90 days after the intervention and rated their recovery with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Favourable recovery was considered mRS 0-2.
During the study, 72 patients were referred to the CSC, 71% of which were first diagnosed at the PSC. Hybrid transport (n = 34) decreased the median time from the start of transport from the PSC to the computed tomography (CT) at the CSC when compared to Ground (n = 17) transport (84 min, IQR 82-86 min vs. 109 min, IQR 104-116 min, p < 0.001). The transport times straight from the scene to CT at the CSC were equal: median 93 min (IQR 80-102 min) in the Hybrid group (n = 11) and 97 min (IQR 91-108 min) in the Ground group (n = 10, p = 0.28). The percentages of favourable recovery were 74% and 50% in the Hybrid and Ground transport groups (p = 0.38) from the PSC. Compared to Ground transportation from the scene, Hybrid transportation had less effect on the positive recovery percentages of 60% and 50% (p = 1.00), respectively.
Adding a HEMS unit to transporting a thrombectomy candidate from a PSC to CSC decreases the transport time compared to ambulance use only. This study showed minimal difference in the recovery after thrombectomy between Hybrid and Ground transports.
机械取栓术是治疗大血管闭塞性卒中的首选方法,仅在综合卒中中心(CSC)开展。我们研究了使用救护车和直升机能否缩短来自其他医院辖区的取栓术候选患者的转运时间,以及这对他们的恢复情况有何影响。
我们前瞻性收集了从南博滕医院辖区转诊至坦佩雷大学医院的取栓术候选患者的时间点。包括一级和二级转运。在混合转运中,直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)机组人员从CSC附近的机场起飞,在转运途中与患者会合,然后继续将患者转运至最终治疗地点。仅在天气不佳无法飞行或HEMS机组人员忙于其他紧急情况时才选择地面转运。我们在干预90天后联系了接受机械取栓术治疗的患者,并用改良Rankin量表(mRS)对他们的恢复情况进行评分。mRS 0 - 2被视为恢复良好。
在研究期间,72名患者被转诊至CSC,其中71%在初级卒中中心(PSC)首次确诊。与地面转运组(n = 17)相比,混合转运组(n = 34)从PSC开始转运至CSC进行计算机断层扫描(CT)的中位时间缩短(84分钟,IQR 82 - 86分钟 vs. 109分钟,IQR 104 - 116分钟,p < 0.001)。从现场直接转运至CSC进行CT检查的时间相同:混合转运组(n = 11)的中位时间为93分钟(IQR 80 - 102分钟),地面转运组(n = 10)为97分钟(IQR 91 - 108分钟,p = 0.28)。从PSC开始,混合转运组和地面转运组恢复良好的比例分别为74%和50%(p = 0.38)。与从现场进行地面转运相比,混合转运对恢复良好比例分别为60%和50%的影响较小(p = 1.00)。
与仅使用救护车相比,增加HEMS机组人员将取栓术候选患者从PSC转运至CSC可缩短转运时间。本研究表明,混合转运和地面转运在取栓术后的恢复情况上差异极小。