Li Debbie, Baxter Nancy N, McLeod Robin S, Moineddin Rahim, Nathens Avery B
1 Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 2 Department of Surgery and Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 3 Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 4 Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 5 Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 6 Department of Family and Community Medicine, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 7 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 8 Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Apr;59(4):332-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000561.
The indications for interval elective colectomy following diverticulitis are unclear; evidence lends increasing support for nonoperative management.
This study aims to evaluate the temporal trends in the use of elective colectomy following diverticulitis.
This is a population-based retrospective cohort study using administrative discharge data.
This study was conducted in Ontario, Canada.
Patients who had had an episode of diverticulitis managed nonoperatively and were eligible for elective colectomy, from 2002 to 2012, were selected.
Changes in the proportion of patients who undergo elective colectomy following an episode of diverticulitis treated nonoperatively were evaluated. Cochran-Armitage was used to test for trends; adjusted analysis was performed by using multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations.
A total of 14,124 patients were admitted with an episode of diverticulitis and treated nonoperatively, making them eligible for interval elective colectomy. Median follow-up was 3.9 years (maximum, 10; interquartile range, 1.7-6.4). Overall, 1342 (9.5%) patients underwent elective colectomy; 33% of these colectomies were performed laparoscopically, and 7.5% patients received an ostomy. In-hospital mortality was 0.2%. The majority (76%) of elective operations were performed within 1 year of discharge (median, 160 days; interquartile range, 88-346). The proportion of patients undergoing elective colectomy within 1 year of discharge declined from 9.6% of patients in 2002 to 3.9% by 2011 (p < 0.001). The decline was most pronounced in patients <50 years of age (from 17% to 5%), and those with complicated disease (from 28% to 8%) (all p < 0.001). In multivariable regression, younger age, lower medical comorbidity, complicated disease, and early readmission were associated with elective colectomy. After adjusting for changes in patient characteristics, the odds of elective surgery decreased by 0.93 per annum (adjusted OR; 95% CI, 0.90-0.95).
Administrative health databases contain limited clinical detail; the rationale for elective surgery was not available.
Consistent with evolving practice guidelines, there has been a decrease in the use of elective colectomy following an episode of diverticulitis.
憩室炎后择期结肠切除术的指征尚不明确;越来越多的证据支持非手术治疗。
本研究旨在评估憩室炎后择期结肠切除术使用情况的时间趋势。
这是一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究,使用行政出院数据。
本研究在加拿大安大略省进行。
选取2002年至2012年期间非手术治疗憩室炎发作且符合择期结肠切除术条件的患者。
评估非手术治疗憩室炎发作后接受择期结肠切除术患者比例的变化。采用 Cochr an - Armitage检验趋势;通过使用广义估计方程的多变量逻辑回归进行校正分析。
共有14124例患者因憩室炎发作入院并接受非手术治疗,使其符合择期结肠切除术条件。中位随访时间为3.9年(最长10年;四分位间距1.7 - 6.4年)。总体而言,1342例(9.5%)患者接受了择期结肠切除术;其中33%的结肠切除术通过腹腔镜进行,7.5%的患者接受了造口术。住院死亡率为0.2%。大多数(76%)择期手术在出院后1年内进行(中位时间为160天;四分位间距88 - 346天)。出院后1年内接受择期结肠切除术的患者比例从2002年的9.6%降至2011年的3.9%(p < 0.001)。这种下降在年龄小于50岁的患者(从17%降至5%)和患有复杂疾病的患者(从28%降至8%)中最为明显(所有p < 0.001)。在多变量回归中,年龄较小、合并症较少、疾病复杂以及早期再入院与择期结肠切除术相关。在调整患者特征变化后,择期手术的几率每年下降0.93(校正比值比;95%可信区间,0.90 - 0.95)。
行政健康数据库包含的临床细节有限;无法获得择期手术的理由。
与不断演变的实践指南一致,憩室炎发作后择期结肠切除术的使用有所减少。