Culyba Alison J, Jacoby Sara F, Richmond Therese S, Fein Joel A, Hohl Bernadette C, Branas Charles C
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania2Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 May 1;170(5):473-80. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.4697.
Homicide is a leading cause of adolescent mortality. To our knowledge, relatively little has been studied in terms of the association between environmental neighborhood features, such as streets, buildings, and natural surroundings, and severe violent injury among youth.
To assess associations between environmental neighborhood features and adolescent homicide in order to identify targets for future place-based interventions.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Population-based case-control study conducted in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from April 15, 2008, to March 31, 2014. We identified adolescents who died by homicide at 13 to 20 years of age from 2010 to 2012 while residing in Philadelphia. We used incidence-density sampling and random-digit dialing to recruit control participants ages 13 to 20 years matched on sex and indoor-outdoor location at the time of each index case participant's homicide.
To obtain environmental data about modifiable features that were present in the immediate surroundings of our case and control participants, blinded field researchers used standardized techniques to photograph case and control participant outdoor locations. Photographic data were stitched together to create 360° panoramic images that were coded for 60 elements of the visible environment.
Adolescent homicide.
We enrolled 143 homicide case participants (mean [SD] age, 18.4 [1.5] years) and 155 matched control participants (mean [SD] age, 17.2 [2.1] years) who were both outdoors at the time of the homicide. In adjusted analyses, multiple features of Philadelphia streets, buildings, and natural surroundings were associated with adolescent homicide. The presence of street lighting (odds ratio [OR], 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09-0.70), illuminated walk/don't walk signs (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.92), painted marked crosswalks (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.04-0.63), public transportation (OR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.49), parks (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.88), and maintained vacant lots (OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.81) were significantly associated with decreased odds of homicide. The odds of homicide were significantly higher in locations with stop signs (OR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.40-13.45), security bars/gratings on houses (OR, 9.23; 95% CI, 2.45-34.80), and private bushes/plantings (OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.18-10.01).
Using a population-based case-control design, we identified multiple modifiable environmental features that might be targeted in future randomized intervention trials designed to reduce youth violence by improving neighborhood context.
杀人是青少年死亡的主要原因。据我们所知,关于街道、建筑物和自然环境等邻里环境特征与青少年严重暴力伤害之间的关联,相对而言研究较少。
评估邻里环境特征与青少年杀人之间的关联,以便确定未来基于场所的干预目标。
设计、地点和参与者:2008年4月15日至2014年3月31日在宾夕法尼亚州费城进行的基于人群的病例对照研究。我们确定了2010年至2012年期间居住在费城时13至20岁因杀人死亡的青少年。我们采用发病密度抽样和随机数字拨号的方法招募年龄在13至20岁之间、在各索引病例参与者杀人时性别和室内外位置相匹配的对照参与者。
为获取关于病例和对照参与者周围可改变特征的环境数据,不知情的现场研究人员使用标准化技术拍摄病例和对照参与者的户外位置。将摄影数据拼接在一起以创建360°全景图像,并对可见环境的60个元素进行编码。
青少年杀人。
我们招募了143名杀人病例参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,18.4[1.5]岁)和155名匹配的对照参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,17.2[2.1]岁),他们在杀人时均在户外。在多因素分析中,费城街道、建筑物和自然环境的多个特征与青少年杀人有关。有路灯(比值比[OR],0.24;95%置信区间,0.09 - 0.70)、亮着的行人通行/禁止通行标志(OR,0.16;95%置信区间,0.03 - 0.92)、有油漆标记的人行横道(OR,0.17;95%置信区间,0.04 - 0.63)、公共交通(OR,0.13;95%置信区间,0.03 - 0.49)、公园(OR,0.09;95%置信区间,0.01 - 0.88)和维护良好的空地(OR,0.17;95%置信区间,0.03 - 0.81)与杀人几率降低显著相关。在有停车标志的地点(OR,4.34;95%置信区间,1.40 - 13.45)、房屋上有安全栅栏/格栅(OR,9.23;95%置信区间,2.45 - 34.80)以及有私人灌木丛/植被(OR,3.44;95%置信区间,1.18 - 10.01)的地方,杀人几率显著更高。
采用基于人群的病例对照设计,我们确定了多个可改变的环境特征,这些特征可能是未来旨在通过改善邻里环境来减少青少年暴力的随机干预试验的目标。