Majid Imran, Haq Inaamul, Imran Saher, Keen Abid, Aziz Khalid, Arif Tasleem
Department of Dermatology, CUTIS Institute of Dermatology, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, GMC Srinagar, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
Indian J Dermatol. 2016 Jan-Feb;61(1):39-44. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.174024.
Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), the scoring system in melasma, needs to be refined.
To propose a more practical scoring system, named as Melasma Severity Index (MSI), for assessing the disease severity and treatment response in melasma.
Four dermatologists were trained to calculate MASI and also the proposed MSI scores. For MSI, the formula used was 0.4 (a × p(2)) l + 0.4 (a × p(2)) r + 0.2 (a × p(2)) n where "a" stands for area, "p" for pigmentation, "l" for left face, "r" for right face, and "n" for nose. On a single day, 30 enrolled patients were randomly examined by each trained dermatologist and their MASI and MSI scores were calculated. Next, each rater re-examined every 6(th) patient for repeat MASI and MSI scoring to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability of MASI and MSI scores. Validity was assessed by comparing the individual scores of each rater with objective data from mexameter and ImageJ software.
Inter-rater reliability, as assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient, was significantly higher for MSI (0.955) as compared to MASI (0.816). Correlation of scores with objective data by Spearman's correlation revealed higher rho values for MSI than for MASI for all raters.
Sample population belonged to a single ethnic group.
MSI is simpler and more practical scoring system for melasma.
黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(MASI),即黄褐斑的评分系统,需要改进。
提出一种更实用的评分系统,称为黄褐斑严重程度指数(MSI),用于评估黄褐斑的疾病严重程度和治疗反应。
对四位皮肤科医生进行培训,使其能够计算MASI以及提议的MSI评分。对于MSI,使用的公式为0.4(a×p(2))l + 0.4(a×p(2))r + 0.2(a×p(2))n,其中“a”代表面积,“p”代表色素沉着,“l”代表左脸,“r”代表右脸,“n”代表鼻子。在同一天,每位经过培训的皮肤科医生对30名入选患者进行随机检查,并计算他们的MASI和MSI评分。接下来,每位评估者对每第6名患者进行重新检查,以重复进行MASI和MSI评分,以评估MASI和MSI评分的评估者内部和评估者间的可靠性。通过将每位评估者的个人评分与皮肤黑色素仪和ImageJ软件的客观数据进行比较来评估有效性。
通过组内相关系数评估,MSI(0.955)的评估者间可靠性显著高于MASI(0.816)。Spearman相关性分析显示,所有评估者的MSI评分与客观数据的相关性rho值均高于MASI。
样本群体属于单一民族。
MSI是一种更简单、更实用的黄褐斑评分系统。