Abadie Roberto, Welch-Lazoritz Melissa, Gelpi-Acosta Camila, Reyes Juan Carlos, Dombrowski Kirk
Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 206 Benton Hall, Lincoln, NE, 68588, USA.
Social Science Department, LaGuardia Community College, 31-10 Thomson Ave., Long Island City, NY, 11101, USA.
Harm Reduct J. 2016 Mar 8;13:10. doi: 10.1186/s12954-016-0099-9.
Blood contained in needles and injection equipment has been identified as a vector for HIV and HCV transmission among people who inject drugs (PWID). Yet, there is often a wide discrepancy in prevalence for both viruses. While microbiological differences between viruses influence prevalence, other variables associated with the way drugs are acquired and used, also play a role.
Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) methods recruited a sample of 315 current intravenous drug users in rural Puerto Rico. Information about type and frequency of use, HIV and HVC risk behaviors (sharing needles, cookers, cotton, and water), sexual behaviors, and alcohol use was collected. HIV and HCV statuses were assessed via rapid antibody tests. T tests compare means of participants who tested positive (reactive) to those who tested negative. Logistic regression analyses were used to validate the association of the risk factors involved.
Tests showed a significant difference in HIV (6%) and HCV (78.4%) prevalence among a population of current PWID. The main risk behaviors in HCV transmission are the sharing of injection "works", (e.g., cookers, cotton, and water). Sharing works occurred more than twice as often as the sharing of needles, and HCV+ and HCV- individuals reported the same needle sharing habits.
Washing and rinsing injection works with water seems to prevent HIV transmission, but it is unable to prevent HCV infection. While education about the need to clean injection equipment with bleach might be beneficial, equipment sharing--and the subsequent risk of HVC--might be unavoidable in a context where participants are forced to pool resources to acquire and use intravenous drugs.
针头和注射设备中所含的血液已被确认为注射吸毒者中艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒传播的媒介。然而,这两种病毒的流行率往往存在很大差异。虽然病毒之间的微生物差异会影响流行率,但与毒品获取和使用方式相关的其他变量也起作用。
采用应答驱动抽样(RDS)方法,在波多黎各农村地区招募了315名当前静脉吸毒者作为样本。收集了关于使用类型和频率、艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒风险行为(共用针头、煮器、棉花和水)、性行为以及饮酒情况的信息。通过快速抗体检测评估艾滋病毒和丙型肝炎病毒感染状况。采用t检验比较检测呈阳性(反应性)参与者与检测呈阴性参与者的均值。使用逻辑回归分析来验证所涉及风险因素的关联。
检测显示,在当前注射吸毒者群体中,艾滋病毒(6%)和丙型肝炎病毒(78.4%)的流行率存在显著差异。丙型肝炎病毒传播的主要风险行为是共用注射“工具”(如煮器、棉花和水)。共用工具的发生频率是共用针头的两倍多,而且丙型肝炎病毒阳性和阴性个体报告的共用针头习惯相同。
用水冲洗注射工具似乎可以预防艾滋病毒传播,但无法预防丙型肝炎病毒感染。虽然关于用漂白剂清洁注射设备必要性的教育可能有益,但在参与者被迫集中资源获取和使用静脉注射毒品的情况下,设备共享以及随之而来的丙型肝炎病毒感染风险可能不可避免。