California State University Monterey Bay, Seaside, CA, United States.
University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States.
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2016;50:135-59. doi: 10.1016/bs.acdb.2015.11.005. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
There has been growing attention to sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) in child and adolescent development, public discourse, and research. A strong tension is clear: The right for participation, and thus representation in data, science, and policy, is often understood as conflicting with the right for protection, that is, safety from disclosure of a marginalized orientation or identity. Both participation and protection rights are also closely tied to young people's rights to privacy (or lack thereof). We review recent scholarship on SOGI in developmental sciences in light of this tension. We focus on schooling as a salient developmental context for all youth, a place that is historically unsafe for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth, and a context where researchers have identified gaps of knowledge as well as strategies for improvement. Our review focuses on the politics and processes of SOGI inclusion in education data collection efforts in the United States, an area where SOGI data collection is scarce in comparison to other systems of care, such as health. We suggest that one solution to the dilemma would be that youth have the right to disclose their SOGI information to whom and when they choose. We offer strategies on how to hold these tensions in balance and move toward SOGI-inclusive research and data collection so that LGBTQ youth can be represented in data, science, and policy.
人们越来越关注儿童和青少年发展、公共话语和研究中的性取向和性别认同(SOGI)。一个明显的紧张局势是:参与权,即数据、科学和政策中的代表性,通常被理解为与保护权(即免受边缘化取向或身份披露的保护)相冲突。参与权和保护权也与年轻人的隐私权(或缺乏隐私权)密切相关。我们根据这一紧张关系审查了最近关于发展科学中 SOGI 的学术研究。我们专注于学校教育,因为它是所有年轻人的重要发展背景,是历史上对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿和质疑(LGBTQ)青年不安全的地方,也是研究人员发现知识差距以及改进策略的地方。我们的审查重点是美国教育数据收集工作中 SOGI 纳入的政治和过程,与其他护理系统(如卫生保健)相比,SOGI 数据收集在美国非常匮乏。我们认为,解决这一困境的一个办法是,青年有权选择向谁和何时披露自己的 SOGI 信息。我们提供了一些策略,以平衡这些紧张关系,并朝着 SOGI 包容性的研究和数据收集方向发展,以便 LGBTQ 青年能够在数据、科学和政策中得到代表。