Hicks Amanda, Hogan William R, Rutherford Michael, Malin Bradley, Xie Mengjun, Fellbaum Christiane, Yin Zhijun, Fabbri Daniel, Hanna Josh, Bian Jiang
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:611-20. eCollection 2015.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends that health care providers collect data on gender identity. If these data are to be useful, they should utilize terms that characterize gender identity in a manner that is 1) sensitive to transgender and gender non-binary individuals (trans* people) and 2) semantically structured to render associated data meaningful to the health care professionals. We developed a set of tools and approaches for analyzing Twitter data as a basis for generating hypotheses on language used to identify gender and discuss gender-related issues across regions and population groups. We offer sample hypotheses regarding regional variations in the usage of certain terms such as 'genderqueer', 'genderfluid', and 'neutrois' and their usefulness as terms on intake forms. While these hypotheses cannot be directly validated with Twitter data alone, our data and tools help to formulate testable hypotheses and design future studies regarding the adequacy of gender identification terms on intake forms.
美国医学研究所(IOM)建议医疗服务提供者收集性别认同数据。若要使这些数据有用,就应使用能够以以下方式描述性别认同的术语:一是对跨性别者和性别非二元性者(跨性别群体)敏感;二是在语义上进行结构化处理,以便让相关数据对医疗专业人员有意义。我们开发了一套用于分析推特数据的工具和方法,以此作为生成关于用于识别性别的语言以及跨地区和人群群体讨论性别相关问题的假设的基础。我们提供了关于某些术语(如“性别酷儿”“流动性别者”和“中性人”)使用情况的地区差异及其在 intake 表格中作为术语的有用性的示例假设。虽然这些假设不能仅通过推特数据直接验证,但我们的数据和工具有助于形成可检验的假设,并设计未来关于 intake 表格上性别识别术语充分性的研究。