• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

追求可比性:研究教师自我效能感量表(TSES)在不同国家的不变性

The Quest for Comparability: Studying the Invariance of the Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES) Measure across Countries.

作者信息

Scherer Ronny, Jansen Malte, Nilsen Trude, Areepattamannil Shaljan, Marsh Herbert W

机构信息

University of Oslo, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Centre for Educational Measurement at the University of Oslo (CEMO), Oslo, Norway.

German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF), Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 Mar 9;11(3):e0150829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150829. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0150829
PMID:26959236
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4784889/
Abstract

Teachers' self-efficacy is an important motivational construct that is positively related to a variety of outcomes for both the teachers and their students. This study addresses challenges associated with the commonly used 'Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES)' measure across countries and provides a synergism between substantive research on teachers' self-efficacy and the novel methodological approach of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM). These challenges include adequately representing the conceptual overlap between the facets of self-efficacy in a measurement model (cross-loadings) and comparing means and factor structures across countries (measurement invariance). On the basis of the OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2013 data set comprising 32 countries (N = 164,687), we investigate the effects of cross-loadings in the TSES measurement model on the results of measurement invariance testing and the estimation of relations to external constructs (i.e., working experience, job satisfaction). To further test the robustness of our results, we replicate the 32-countries analyses for three selected sub-groups of countries (i.e., Nordic, East and South-East Asian, and Anglo-Saxon country clusters). For each of the TALIS 2013 participating countries, we found that the factor structure of the self-efficacy measure is better represented by ESEM than by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models that do not allow for cross-loadings. For both ESEM and CFA, only metric invariance could be achieved. Nevertheless, invariance levels beyond metric invariance are better achieved with ESEM within selected country clusters. Moreover, the existence of cross-loadings did not affect the relations between the dimensions of teachers' self-efficacy and external constructs. Overall, this study shows that a conceptual overlap between the facets of self-efficacy exists and can be well-represented by ESEM. We further argue for the cross-cultural generalizability of the corresponding measurement model.

摘要

教师自我效能感是一个重要的动机性概念,与教师及其学生的多种结果呈正相关。本研究探讨了各国普遍使用的“教师自我效能感量表(TSES)”在测量过程中所面临的挑战,并在教师自我效能感的实证研究与探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)这一新颖的方法论之间实现了协同。这些挑战包括在测量模型中充分体现自我效能感各维度之间的概念重叠(交叉载荷),以及在不同国家间比较均值和因子结构(测量不变性)。基于经济合作与发展组织(OECD)2013年国际教学与学习调查(TALIS)数据集,该数据集涵盖32个国家(N = 164,687),我们研究了TSES测量模型中的交叉载荷对测量不变性检验结果以及与外部构念(即工作经验、工作满意度)关系估计的影响。为了进一步检验我们结果的稳健性,我们对三个选定的国家子群体(即北欧、东亚和东南亚以及盎格鲁 - 撒克逊国家集群)重复了32个国家的分析。对于2013年TALIS参与的每个国家,我们发现,与不允许交叉载荷的验证性因子分析(CFA)模型相比,ESEM能更好地体现自我效能感测量的因子结构。对于ESEM和CFA,都只能实现度量不变性。然而,在选定的国家集群中,ESEM能更好地实现超越度量不变性的不变性水平。此外,交叉载荷的存在并未影响教师自我效能感维度与外部构念之间的关系。总体而言,本研究表明自我效能感各维度之间存在概念重叠,且ESEM能够很好地体现这一点。我们进一步主张相应测量模型具有跨文化的普遍性。

相似文献

1
The Quest for Comparability: Studying the Invariance of the Teachers' Sense of Self-Efficacy (TSES) Measure across Countries.追求可比性:研究教师自我效能感量表(TSES)在不同国家的不变性
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 9;11(3):e0150829. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150829. eCollection 2016.
2
Investigation of the Impact of School Climate and Teachers' Self-Efficacy on Job Satisfaction: A Cross-Cultural Approach.学校氛围和教师自我效能感对工作满意度影响的调查:一种跨文化方法
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2019 Oct 14;10(1):119-133. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10010011.
3
Psychometric properties of the Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale in a sample of Chilean public school teachers.智利公立学校教师样本中教师效能感量表的心理测量特性。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 22;14:1272548. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1272548. eCollection 2023.
4
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Teacher Efficacy Scale for prospective teachers.职前教师教学效能感量表的验证性因素分析
Br J Educ Psychol. 2005 Dec;75(Pt 4):689-708. doi: 10.1348/000709905X37253.
5
Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of the Need-Supportive Teaching Style Scale for Physical Education.体育教育需求支持性教学风格量表的因子结构与测量不变性
Percept Mot Skills. 2017 Aug;124(4):864-879. doi: 10.1177/0031512517712803. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
6
Partial measurement invariance of beliefs about teaching for creativity across U.S. and Chinese educators.中美教育工作者关于创造性教学信念的部分测量不变性。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Jun;91(2):563-583. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12379. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
7
Pre-service science teachers' teaching self-efficacy in relation to personality traits and academic self-regulation.职前科学教师的教学自我效能感与人格特质和学业自我调节的关系。
Span J Psychol. 2013;16:E12. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2013.22.
8
Application of an innovative alignment optimisation method to a cross-cultural mean comparison of teacher self-efficacy: A cross-country study.一种创新的校准优化方法在教师自我效能感跨文化均值比较中的应用:一项跨国研究。
Heliyon. 2021 Oct 20;7(10):e08212. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08212. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Similarities and dissimilarities between teachers' and students' relationship views in upper elementary school: The role of personal teacher and student attributes.小学高年段师生关系观点的异同:个人教师和学生属性的作用。
J Sch Psychol. 2017 Oct;64:43-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2017.04.007. Epub 2017 May 10.
10
Variables that influence teachers' practice of differentiated instruction in Chinese classrooms: A study from teachers' perspectives.影响中国课堂教师差异化教学实践的变量:一项基于教师视角的研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 6;14:1124259. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1124259. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of an innovative alignment optimisation method to a cross-cultural mean comparison of teacher self-efficacy: A cross-country study.一种创新的校准优化方法在教师自我效能感跨文化均值比较中的应用:一项跨国研究。
Heliyon. 2021 Oct 20;7(10):e08212. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08212. eCollection 2021 Oct.
2
Sources of Health care providers' Self-efficacy to deliver Health Education: a qualitative study.卫生保健提供者进行健康教育自我效能感的来源:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jan 9;19(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1448-z.
3
Teacher Efficacy, Work Engagement, and Social Support Among Chinese Special Education School Teachers.

本文引用的文献

1
Replication and robustness in developmental research.发育研究中的重复性与稳健性。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Nov;50(11):2417-25. doi: 10.1037/a0037996. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
2
Contributions of internationalization to psychology: toward a global and inclusive discipline.国际化对心理学的贡献:走向全球化和包容性的学科。
Am Psychol. 2013 Nov;68(8):761-70. doi: 10.1037/a0033762.
3
Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.探索性结构方程模型:探索性和验证性因子分析最佳特征的整合。
中国特殊教育学校教师的教学效能感、工作投入与社会支持
Front Psychol. 2018 May 7;9:648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00648. eCollection 2018.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
4
Interrelations of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive school engagement in high school students.高中生行为、情感和认知学业投入的相互关系。
J Youth Adolesc. 2013 Jan;42(1):20-32. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9857-5. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
5
Bayesian structural equation modeling: a more flexible representation of substantive theory.贝叶斯结构方程建模:对实质性理论更灵活的表述。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):313-35. doi: 10.1037/a0026802.
6
When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.类别变量在何时可以视为连续变量?在次优条件下稳健连续和类别 SEM 估计方法的比较。
Psychol Methods. 2012 Sep;17(3):354-73. doi: 10.1037/a0029315. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
7
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic.确保尺度差异卡方检验统计量的正值性。
Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
8
The concept of validity.效度的概念。
Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):1061-71. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061.
9
Science, ethnicity, and bias: where have we gone wrong?科学、种族与偏见:我们错在哪里?
Am Psychol. 1999 Dec;54(12):1070-7. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.54.12.1070.
10
Burnout and self-efficacy: a study on teachers' beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in the Netherlands.职业倦怠与自我效能感:关于荷兰教师在实施创新教育体系时信念的研究
Br J Educ Psychol. 2002 Jun;72(Pt 2):227-43. doi: 10.1348/000709902158865.