• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Shame as a Cultural Artifact: A Call for Self-Awareness and Reflexivity in Personality Assessment.

作者信息

Aschieri Filippo

机构信息

a European Center for Therapeutic Assessment, Catholic University of the Sacred Hearth , Milan , Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2016 Nov-Dec;98(6):567-75. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1146289. Epub 2016 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2016.1146289
PMID:26959557
Abstract

It has become common for assessors to face therapeutic impasses and dilemmas when practicing within the Therapeutic Assessment (TA) model. This is due to the explicit goal of producing therapeutic changes in clients. In this article the author discusses the importance of assessors being aware of how their clinical practices relate to their assessment outcomes. To enhance such awareness, the author reviews the characteristics of psychological assessment practices as derived from 3 paradigms developed almost 1.5 centuries ago in Europe by the forefathers of psychology as a scientific discipline. Current assessment practices are deeply ingrained in specific cultural, social, and political frameworks originating in these paradigms. Being aware of such a historical and cultural background might help the assessor avoid blindly reenacting the values, norms, and latent relational schemas implied by different assessment methods, and instead use assessment tools as potent aids in the service of clients' change. Finally, the author illustrates how the experience of clients' shame in psychological assessment might also be understood as a by-product of the specific cultural and historical background of certain common assessment practices.

摘要

相似文献

1
Shame as a Cultural Artifact: A Call for Self-Awareness and Reflexivity in Personality Assessment.
J Pers Assess. 2016 Nov-Dec;98(6):567-75. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1146289. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
2
Native Hawaiians and psychology: the cultural and historical context of indigenous ways of knowing.原著民夏威夷人和心理学:本土认知方式的文化和历史背景。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2009 Oct;15(4):374-87. doi: 10.1037/a0016774.
3
Critical psychology: A geography of intellectual engagement and resistance.批判心理学:智识介入与抵抗的地理学。
Am Psychol. 2015 Apr;70(3):243-54. doi: 10.1037/a0038727. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
4
The concept of personality in 19th-century French and 20th-century American psychology.19世纪法国心理学和20世纪美国心理学中的人格概念。
Hist Psychol. 2003 May;6(2):123-42. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.6.2.123.
5
Paul E. Meehl's contributions to personality assessment.保罗·E·米尔对人格评估的贡献。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2006 May;115(2):201-4. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.201.
6
Note on "History of psychology in India: Problems and prospects".关于《印度心理学史:问题与展望》的注释
Hist Psychol. 2017 Feb;20(1):126-128. doi: 10.1037/h0101578.
7
Gordon Allport, character, and the "culture of personality," 1897-1937.戈登·奥尔波特、性格与“人格文化”,1897 - 1937年
Hist Psychol. 1998 Feb;1(1):52-68. doi: 10.1037/1093-4510.1.1.52.
8
One surprise after another.惊喜连连。
J Pers Assess. 2008 May;90(3):205-14. doi: 10.1080/00223890701884780.
9
Heisenberg, Kandinsky, and the heteromethod convergence problem: lessons from within and beyond psychology.海森堡、康定斯基与异方法收敛问题:心理学内外的教训
J Pers Assess. 2009 Jan;91(1):1-8. doi: 10.1080/00223890802483235.
10
Sidney Blatt's Contributions to Personality Assessment.西德尼·布拉特对人格评估的贡献。
J Pers Assess. 2016;98(1):1-4. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1107728. Epub 2015 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychosocial Experience and Coping of AIDS Patients About the Disease: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.艾滋病患者关于该疾病的心理社会经历与应对:一项系统综述与定性元综合分析
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Sep 8;18:1903-1914. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S539554. eCollection 2025.
2
Increasing character strength knowledge, interest, and skill: preliminary evidence for a collaborative and multimethod assessment procedure.增强性格优势知识、兴趣和技能:一种协作式多方法评估程序的初步证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 27;14:1179052. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1179052. eCollection 2023.
3
Could the DSM-5 Cultural Formulation Interview Hold Therapeutic Potential? Suggestions for Further Exploration and Adaptation Within a Framework of Therapeutic Assessment.
DSM-5 文化构念访谈是否具有治疗潜力?在治疗评估框架内进一步探索和调整的建议。
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;46(4):846-863. doi: 10.1007/s11013-021-09761-2. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
Introduction to the Special Section on Cultural Considerations in Collaborative and Therapeutic Assessment.协作与治疗评估中的文化考量专题介绍
J Pers Assess. 2016 Nov-Dec;98(6):563-6. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1196455.