Brosnan Mark, Lewton Marcus, Ashwin Chris
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Jun;46(6):2115-2125. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-2742-4.
Dual process theory proposes two distinct reasoning processes in humans, an intuitive style that is rapid and automatic and a deliberative style that is more effortful. However, no study to date has specifically examined these reasoning styles in relation to the autism spectrum. The present studies investigated deliberative and intuitive reasoning profiles in: (1) a non-clinical sample from the general population with varying degrees of autism traits (n = 95), and (2) males diagnosed with ASD (n = 17) versus comparisons (n = 18). Taken together, the results suggest reasoning on the autism spectrum is compatible with the processes proposed by Dual Process Theory and that higher autism traits and ASD are characterised by a consistent bias towards deliberative reasoning (and potentially away from intuition).
双加工理论提出人类存在两种不同的推理过程,一种是快速且自动的直觉式风格,另一种是更费力的深思熟虑式风格。然而,迄今为止尚无研究专门考察这些推理风格与自闭症谱系的关系。本研究调查了以下两组人群的深思熟虑式和直觉式推理概况:(1)来自普通人群的具有不同程度自闭症特征的非临床样本(n = 95),以及(2)被诊断患有自闭症谱系障碍的男性(n = 17)与对照组(n = 18)。综合来看,结果表明自闭症谱系上的推理与双加工理论提出的过程相符,且较高的自闭症特征和自闭症谱系障碍的特点是始终偏向于深思熟虑式推理(可能远离直觉)。