Suppr超能文献

β受体阻滞剂和肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者生存率的影响。

Effect of Beta Blockers and Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

作者信息

Lee Pil Hyung, Park Gyung-Min, Kim Young-Hak, Yun Sung-Cheol, Chang Mineok, Roh Jae-Hyung, Yoon Sung-Han, Ahn Jung-Min, Park Duk-Woo, Kang Soo-Jin, Lee Seung-Whan, Lee Cheol Whan, Park Seong-Wook, Park Seung-Jung

机构信息

From the Department of Cardiology (PHL, Y-HK, MC, J-HR, S-HY, J-MA, D-WP, S-JK, S-WL, CWL, S-WP, S-JP); Division of Biostatistics (S-CY), Center for Medical Research and Information, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine; and Department of Cardiology (G-MP), Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(10):e2971. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002971.

Abstract

Because it remains uncertain whether β-blockers (BBs) and/or renin-angiotensin system inhibitors benefit a broad population of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs in improving survival for post-AMI patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).From the nationwide data of the South Korea National Health Insurance, 33,390 patients with a diagnosis of AMI who underwent a PCI between 2009 and 2013 and survived at least 30 days were included in this study. We evaluated the risk of all-cause death for patients treated with both BB and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB) (n = 16,280), only BB (n = 3683), and only ACEI/ARB (n = 9849), with the drug-untreated patients (n = 3578) as the reference.Over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, although treated patients displayed a trend toward improved survival, there were no significant differences in the adjusted risk of all-cause death when patients were treated with both drugs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-1.06, P = 0.154), BB (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.68-1.14, P = 0.325), or ACEI/ARB (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.68-1.04, P = 0.111). No additional benefit was found for the combination therapy compared with either isolated BB (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80-1.21, P = 0.856) or ACEI/ARB (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89-1.19, P = 0.727) therapy.Treatment with BB and/or ACEI/ARB has limited effect on survival in unselected nonfatal AMI patients who undergo PCI.

摘要

由于β受体阻滞剂(BBs)和/或肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制剂是否能使广大急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者获益仍不确定,我们试图评估这些药物对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的AMI后患者提高生存率的有效性。本研究纳入了韩国国民健康保险的全国性数据中,2009年至2013年间诊断为AMI且接受了PCI并存活至少30天的33390例患者。我们评估了同时接受BB和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)/血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂(ARB)治疗的患者(n = 16280)、仅接受BB治疗的患者(n = 3683)和仅接受ACEI/ARB治疗的患者(n = 9849)的全因死亡风险,并将未接受药物治疗的患者(n = 3578)作为对照。在中位随访2.4年期间,尽管接受治疗的患者显示出生存改善的趋势,但接受两种药物治疗的患者(风险比[HR] 0.86,95%置信区间[CI] 0.70 - 1.06,P = 0.154)、BB治疗的患者(HR 0.88,95% CI 0.68 - 1.14,P = 0.325)或ACEI/ARB治疗的患者(HR 0.84,95% CI 0.68 - 1.04,P = 0.111)在调整后的全因死亡风险方面没有显著差异。与单独使用BB(HR 0.98,95% CI 0.80 - 1.21,P = 0.856)或ACEI/ARB(HR 1.03,95% CI 0.89 - 1.19,P = 0.727)治疗相比,联合治疗未发现额外益处。在未选择的接受PCI的非致命AMI患者中,使用BB和/或ACEI/ARB治疗对生存的影响有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cab2/4998883/1eb102a75627/medi-95-e02971-g002.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验