Suppr超能文献

超越β受体阻滞剂:ACEI 降低高 Killip 级别的 AMI 患者的非心脏死亡率。

Beyond β-Blockade: ACE Inhibitors Reduce Non-Cardiac Mortality in High Killip Grade AMI Patients.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Zhoushan Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhoushan, China.

Department of Cardiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jan-Dec;29:10742484241264673. doi: 10.1177/10742484241264673. Epub 2024 Jul 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the 3-year clinical outcomes of high Killip grade (III/IV) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients treated with either β-blockers (BB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or BB and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB).

METHODS

A total of 13,105 patients were registered at the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry at the National Institute of Health (KAMIR-NIH). Among them, 871 patients with high Killip classification AMI were divided into the BB + ACEI group (n = 489) and the BB + ARB group (n = 381). Following propensity score matching, 343 patients were selected in each group. All patients completed a 3-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

The results indicate no significant differences between the BB + ACEI group and BB + ARB group in terms of cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and the rate of repeat percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the BB + ACEI group exhibited significantly lower risks in major adverse cardiac events (HR = 0.574, 95% CI: 0.421-0.783,  < .001), all-cause mortality (HR = 0.561, 95% CI: 0.404-0.778,  = .001), and non-cardiac death (HR = 0.365, 95% CI: 0.208-0.639,  < .001) compared to the BB + ARB group.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that BB + ACEI treatment is more beneficial than BB + ARB for high Killip grade AMI patients. Additionally, the BB + ACEI group has a superior preventative effect on mortality compared to the BB + ARB group.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了接受β受体阻滞剂(BB)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或 BB 和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗的高 Killip 分级(III/IV)急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的 3 年临床结局。

方法

共 13105 例患者在韩国国立卫生研究院(KAMIR-NIH)的韩国急性心肌梗死注册中心登记。其中,871 例高 Killip 分级 AMI 患者分为 BB+ACEI 组(n=489)和 BB+ARB 组(n=381)。在倾向评分匹配后,每组各选择 343 例患者。所有患者均完成了 3 年随访。

结果

BB+ACEI 组与 BB+ARB 组在心脏死亡、再发心肌梗死和再次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗率方面无显著差异。然而,BB+ACEI 组在主要不良心脏事件(HR=0.574,95%CI:0.421-0.783,  < .001)、全因死亡率(HR=0.561,95%CI:0.404-0.778,  = .001)和非心脏性死亡(HR=0.365,95%CI:0.208-0.639,  < .001)方面的风险显著较低。

结论

我们的结果表明,BB+ACEI 治疗对高 Killip 分级 AMI 患者比 BB+ARB 更有益。此外,与 BB+ARB 组相比,BB+ACEI 组在死亡率方面具有更好的预防效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验