Suppr超能文献

埃利西得平用于转移性或晚期胃食管癌的Ib/II期研究(IMAGE试验)。

Phase Ib/II study of elisidepsin in metastatic or advanced gastroesophageal cancer (IMAGE trial).

作者信息

Petty Russell, Anthoney Alan, Metges Jean-Philippe, Alsina Maria, Gonçalves Anthony, Brown Jennifer, Montagut Clara, Gunzer Katharina, Laus Gianluca, Iglesias Dios Jorge Luis, Miguel-Lillo Bernardo, Bohan Patrick, Salazar Ramón

机构信息

Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK.

St James University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;77(4):819-27. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-2991-0. Epub 2016 Mar 10.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the recommended dose and antitumor activity of single-agent elisidepsin as a 24-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion fortnightly [biweekly, d1 and 15 every 4 weeks (q4wk); Arm A, dose-intensity strategy] or as a 3-h i.v. infusion weekly (d1, 8, 15 and 22 q4wk; Arm B, dose-density strategy) in adult patients with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic pretreated esophageal, gastroesophageal junction and gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomized to one of two elisidepsin dosing schedules. Phase Ib starting doses were 8.0 mg flat dose (FD) in Arm A and 3.0 mg FD in Arm B. Phase II subsequently explored antitumor activity of both dosing schedules at the respective recommended doses.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients received elisidepsin: 12 in stage Ib and 32 in stage II. The recommended doses were defined as 10 mg FD (Arm A) and 3.75 mg FD (Arm B). Both schedules were well tolerated. Most adverse events were mild or moderate, reversible and predictable with no meaningful differences between schedules. The pharmacokinetic profiles of both schedules were similar to those reported previously in patients with solid tumors treated with a comparable dose. An interim analysis found tumor control in one patient receiving elisidepsin fortnightly, and in none given elisidepsin weekly; patient accrual was therefore discontinued due to lack of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Both schedules at the recommended doses presented an acceptable safety profile, but lack of response means that we do not recommend further evaluation of single-agent elisidepsin as chemotherapy for unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic gastroesophageal cancer.

摘要

目的

确定单药埃利西地辛作为每两周一次(每4周的第1天和第15天,双周给药;A组,剂量强度策略)24小时静脉输注,或每周一次(每4周的第1、8、15和22天,剂量密集策略)3小时静脉输注,在不可切除的局部晚期或转移性经预处理的食管癌、胃食管交界癌和胃癌成年患者中的推荐剂量和抗肿瘤活性。

方法

患者被随机分配至两种埃利西地辛给药方案之一。Ib期起始剂量在A组为8.0毫克固定剂量(FD),在B组为3.0毫克FD。II期随后在各自推荐剂量下探索两种给药方案的抗肿瘤活性。

结果

44例患者接受了埃利西地辛治疗:Ib期12例,II期32例。推荐剂量确定为10毫克FD(A组)和3.75毫克FD(B组)。两种方案耐受性良好。大多数不良事件为轻度或中度,可逆且可预测,两种方案之间无显著差异。两种方案的药代动力学特征与先前报道的接受可比剂量治疗的实体瘤患者相似。一项中期分析发现,每两周接受一次埃利西地辛治疗的一名患者出现肿瘤控制,而每周接受一次埃利西地辛治疗的患者均未出现;因此,由于缺乏疗效,停止入组患者。

结论

推荐剂量下的两种方案均具有可接受的安全性,但缺乏反应意味着我们不建议进一步评估单药埃利西地辛作为不可切除的局部晚期或转移性胃食管癌的化疗药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验