UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, CA
UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, Los Angeles, CA Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Diabetes Care. 2016 May;39(5):743-9. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1323. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
We examined the existence of disparities in receipt of appropriate diabetes care among California's fee-for-service Medicaid beneficiaries and the effectiveness of a telephonic-based disease management program delivered by a disease management vendor on the reduction of racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes care.
We conducted an intervention-control cohort study to test the effectiveness of a 3-year-long disease management program delivered to Medicaid fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 22 to 75 with a diagnosis of diabetes in Los Angeles and Alameda counties. The outcome measures were the receipt of at least one hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test, LDL cholesterol test, and retinal examination each year. We used generalized estimating equations models with logit link to analyze the claims data for a cohort of beneficiaries in two intervention counties (n = 2,933) and eight control counties (n = 2,988) from September 2005 through August 2010.
Racial/ethnic disparities existed in the receipt of all three types of testing in the intervention counties before the program. African Americans (0.66; 95% CI 0.62-0.70) and Latinos (0.77; 95% CI 0.74-0.80) had lower rates of receipt for HbA1c testing than whites (0.83; 95% CI 0.81-0.85) in the intervention counties. After the intervention, the disparity among African Americans and Latinos compared with whites persisted in the intervention counties. For Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders, the disparity in testing rates decreased. We did not find similar disparities in the control counties.
This disease management program was not effective in reducing racial/ethnic disparities in diabetes care in the most racially/ethnically diverse counties in California.
我们研究了在加利福尼亚州的按服务收费的医疗补助受益人群中,接受适当糖尿病治疗方面是否存在差异,以及由疾病管理供应商提供的基于电话的疾病管理计划对减少糖尿病治疗中种族/民族差异的有效性。
我们进行了一项干预对照队列研究,以测试一项为期 3 年的疾病管理计划对洛杉矶和阿拉米达县 22 至 75 岁患有糖尿病的医疗补助按服务收费受益人群的有效性。结果测量指标是每年至少接受一次血红蛋白 A1c(HbA1c)测试、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇测试和视网膜检查。我们使用广义估计方程模型和对数链接分析了 2005 年 9 月至 2010 年 8 月期间两个干预县(n=2933)和八个对照县(n=2988)受益人群的索赔数据。
在计划实施之前,干预县的所有三种检测都存在种族/民族差异。与白人(0.83;95%CI 0.81-0.85)相比,非裔美国人(0.66;95%CI 0.62-0.70)和拉丁裔(0.77;95%CI 0.74-0.80)接受 HbA1c 检测的比例较低。干预后,非裔美国人和拉丁裔与白人之间的差距在干预县仍然存在。对于亚裔美国人和太平洋岛民,检测率的差距有所缩小。在对照组中,我们没有发现类似的差异。
在加利福尼亚州种族/民族最多样化的县中,该疾病管理计划在减少糖尿病治疗中的种族/民族差异方面并不有效。