Integrated Cancer Prevention Center, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Gastroenterology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Integrated Cancer Prevention Center, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Feb;4(1):105-9. doi: 10.1177/2050640615583409. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
Although screening colonoscopy is effective for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), screening rates remain low. Multiple factors are thought to be responsible for the low rates of screening colonoscopy, but bowel preparation appears to be a key deterrent. Tolerability issues with bowel preparations may lead to poor patient compliance, inadequate colon cleansing, and reduced detection of colonic polyps.
The aim of this article is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and outcomes of minimally prepared intra-procedural hydroflush technique as an alternative to traditional bowel preparation in screening colonoscopy.
We conducted a prospective feasibility study of intraprocedural hydroflush technique aided by water-jet pumps and a mechanical suction novel device following minimal bowel preparation for CRC screening.
Nine procedures were performed in nine healthy individuals scheduled for routine screening colonoscopy. Preparation included mild diet restriction, laxative tablets two to three days prior to the procedure and two Fleet enemas one to two hours before the colonoscopy. The cleanliness of the colon was assessed by using the Boston bowel preparation scale. Insertion and withdrawal times were recorded.
Complete colonoscopy to the cecum was performed in all patients (100%). Mean time to the cecum was 5.78 ± 2.68 minutes, and mean withdrawal time was 15.33 ± 3.94 minutes. Endoscopic visualization of the entire mucosa was achieved in all cases with no colonoscopy repeated because of inadequate preparation. Four polyps have been detected and removed in three patients. Mild mucosal erosions were seen in some areas where the suction was used extensively, similar to those that can be seen during conventional colonoscopy. Mild stiffness of the shaft of the scope was noted.
This was an uncontrolled feasibility study of selected patients.
Minimally prepared colonoscopy with the intra-procedural hydroflush technique for colorectal screening is feasible. The water exchange technology compensates for the mild stiffness of the scope. This technique might increase patients' compliance for CRC screening.
尽管筛查结肠镜检查可有效发现结直肠癌(CRC),但筛查率仍然较低。多种因素被认为是导致结肠镜检查筛查率低的原因,但肠道准备似乎是一个关键的障碍。肠道准备的耐受性问题可能导致患者依从性差、结肠清洁不充分以及结肠息肉的检出率降低。
本文旨在评估微创术中水力冲洗技术作为传统肠道准备的替代方案在筛查结肠镜检查中的可行性、安全性和结果。
我们对 9 名健康个体进行了前瞻性微创术中水力冲洗技术可行性研究,这些个体接受了轻度饮食限制、泻药片 2-3 天以及在结肠镜检查前 1-2 小时使用 2 次福氏灌肠剂进行了 CRC 筛查的肠道准备。使用波士顿肠道准备量表评估结肠的清洁度。记录插入和退出时间。
9 例患者共进行了 9 例结肠镜检查。准备包括轻度饮食限制、在检查前 2-3 天服用泻药片以及在结肠镜检查前 1-2 小时使用 2 次福氏灌肠剂。使用波士顿肠道准备量表评估结肠的清洁度。记录插入和退出时间。
所有患者(100%)均成功完成了全结肠至盲肠的结肠镜检查。到达盲肠的平均时间为 5.78±2.68 分钟,平均退出时间为 15.33±3.94 分钟。所有病例均能观察到整个黏膜,没有因准备不充分而重复进行结肠镜检查。在 3 名患者中发现并切除了 4 个息肉。在广泛使用抽吸的区域可以看到类似的轻微黏膜糜烂,类似于在常规结肠镜检查中看到的糜烂。注意到镜身有轻微的僵硬。
这是一项针对选定患者的非对照可行性研究。
微创术中水力冲洗技术用于结直肠筛查的肠道准备较少是可行的。水交换技术弥补了镜身的轻微僵硬。这种技术可能会提高患者对 CRC 筛查的依从性。