Montoro Richard, Thombs Brett, Igartua Karine J
Centre d'orientation sexuelle de l'Université McGill; Hôpital général de Montréal, Département de psychiatrie.
Hôpital général juif de Montréal, Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry.
Sante Ment Que. 2015 Fall;40(3):55-75.
Context Bullying is a known risk factor for suicidality, and suicide is the second leading cause of death for adolescents. Both are increased in sexual minority youth (SMY). As SMY are comprised of youth who self-identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual (GLB) or who have same-sex attractions or behaviors, our previous finding that different subgroups have different risks for suicidality is understandable. Given that the difference was along sexual identity lines (GLB vs heterosexual SMY), the analysis of bullying data in the same subgroups was felt to be important.Objective To compare the association of bullying and suicide among heterosexual students without same-sex attractions or behaviors, heterosexual students with same-sex attractions and behaviors, and students with gay, lesbian or bisexual (GLB) or unsure sexual identities.Design The 2004 Quebec Youth Risk Behavior Survey (QYRBS) questionnaire was based on the 2001 Center for Disease Control Youth Risk Behavior Survey, and included items assessing the three dimensions of sexual orientation (identity, attraction and behavior), health risk behaviors, experiences of harassment, and suicidal ideation, plans and attempts.Methods A total of 1852 students 14-18 years of age from 14 public and private high schools in Montréal Québec were surveyed anonymously during the 2004-2005 academic year.Main outcome measure Self reports of suicidal ideation, suicidal plan and suicide attempts in the last 12 months.Results In all, 117 students (6.3%) had a non-heterosexual identity (GLB or unsure) and 115 students (6.3%) had a heterosexual identity with same-sex attraction or behavior. Bullying occurred in 24% of heterosexual students without same-sex attraction or behavior, 32% of heterosexual students with same-sex attraction or behavior, and 48% of non-heterosexually identified students. In multivariable analysis, the common risk factors of age, gender, depressed mood, drug use, fighting, physical and sexual abuse, and age of initial sexual contact were controlled. The reference group was heterosexual students without same-sex attraction or behavior and no bullying. When these students were bullied, they were more likely to have suicidal ideation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.52-2.92) but not suicide attempts. Non-heterosexual students with no bullying were twice as likely to have suicidal ideation (OR = 2.35, 95% CI = 1.24-4.48) and four times as likely when bullied (OR = 4.44, 95% CI = 2.26-8.72). Similarly for suicide attempts, they were not at increased risk when not bullied, but they were almost three times as likely when bullied (OR = 2.87, 95% CI = 1.43-5.78). Heterosexual students with same-sex attraction or behavior were never more likely on any of the suicide measures compared to the reference group, even when bullied.Conclusion This study was the first to show that adolescent students with a non-heterosexual identity will have a disproportionate increase in their suicide parameters when subject to harassment, but that heterosexually identified students with same-sex attraction or behavior did not have an increased risk over heterosexually identified students without same-sex attraction. This suggests that same-sex attraction and behavior on their own are not contributory to suicide risk, and that the efforts of future research as well as public health efforts may be better served by examining the interface between sexual identity and the school, family, and larger culture that surrounds the sexual minority youth. Longitudinal studies looking at the interplay between all these factors are needed.
霸凌是已知的自杀风险因素,自杀是青少年的第二大死因。这两者在性少数青年(SMY)中都更为常见。由于性少数青年包括自我认同为男同性恋、女同性恋、双性恋(GLB)或有同性吸引或行为的青年,我们之前发现不同亚组有不同的自杀风险是可以理解的。鉴于这种差异是基于性取向(GLB与异性恋性少数青年),对同一亚组中的霸凌数据进行分析被认为很重要。
比较无同性吸引或行为的异性恋学生、有同性吸引和行为的异性恋学生以及有男同性恋、女同性恋或双性恋(GLB)身份或性取向不确定的学生中霸凌与自杀之间的关联。
2004年魁北克青少年风险行为调查(QYRBS)问卷基于2001年疾病控制中心青少年风险行为调查,包括评估性取向(身份、吸引和行为)三个维度、健康风险行为、骚扰经历以及自杀意念、计划和企图的项目。
在2004 - 2005学年期间,对魁北克蒙特利尔14所公立和私立高中的1852名14 - 18岁学生进行了匿名调查。
过去12个月内自杀意念、自杀计划和自杀未遂的自我报告。
总共有117名学生(6.3%)具有非异性恋身份(GLB或不确定),115名学生(6.3%)具有异性恋身份但有同性吸引或行为。在无同性吸引或行为的异性恋学生中,24%曾遭受霸凌;有同性吸引或行为的异性恋学生中,32%曾遭受霸凌;非异性恋身份的学生中,48%曾遭受霸凌。在多变量分析中,控制了年龄、性别、情绪低落、药物使用、打架、身体和性虐待以及初次性接触年龄等共同风险因素。参照组是无同性吸引或行为且未遭受霸凌的异性恋学生。当这些学生受到霸凌时,他们更有可能产生自杀意念(比值比[OR]=2.11,95%置信区间[CI]=1.52 - 2.92),但自杀未遂的可能性未增加。未遭受霸凌的非异性恋学生产生自杀意念的可能性是参照组的两倍(OR = 2.35,95% CI = 1.24 - 4.48),遭受霸凌时则是四倍(OR = 4.44,95% CI = 2.26 - 8.72)。同样对于自杀未遂,未遭受霸凌时他们的风险未增加,但遭受霸凌时几乎是参照组的三倍(OR = 2.87,95% CI = 1.43 - 5.78)。与参照组相比,有同性吸引或行为的异性恋学生在任何自杀指标上都没有更高的可能性,即使受到霸凌也是如此。
本研究首次表明,具有非异性恋身份的青少年学生在遭受骚扰时自杀参数会不成比例地增加,但有同性吸引或行为的异性恋身份学生与无同性吸引的异性恋身份学生相比,风险并未增加。这表明同性吸引和行为本身并不会导致自杀风险增加,未来的研究以及公共卫生工作可能通过研究性取向与围绕性少数青年的学校、家庭和更大文化之间的相互作用而得到更好的开展。需要进行纵向研究来考察所有这些因素之间的相互作用。