Moodie Sheila, Rall Eileen, Eiten Leisha, Lindley George, Gordey Dave, Davidson Lisa, Bagatto Marlene, Scollie Susan
J Am Acad Audiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):166-187. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.15064.
There is broad consensus that screening and diagnosis of permanent hearing loss in children must be embedded within a comprehensive, evidence-based, family-centered intervention program. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for pediatric hearing assessment and hearing aid verification aim to reduce variability in practice and increase the use of effective evidence-based diagnostic and treatment options so that optimal outcomes may be achieved. To be of value, guidelines must be translated and implemented into practice and ongoing monitoring of their use in practice should occur.
This paper provides the results of two studies that aim to examine current pediatric audiology and amplification practice in North America.
A concurrent embedded mixed methods design was used.
An electronic survey was distributed to North American audiologists who delivered pediatric audiology services with 350 audiologists participating in study 1 and 63 audiologists participating in study 2.
A quantitative approach was the predominant method of data collection. Respondents were prompted to provide additional qualitative text and detail regarding their quantitative response choice. This qualitative text was used during the analysis phase and combined with quantitative results to assist understanding of respondents' knowledge, skills, and barriers/facilitators to implement best practice in pediatric amplification.
Approximately 70% of audiologists reported using best-practice protocols for pediatric hearing aid fitting. Despite widespread knowledge and increased use of CPGs over the last 18 yrs, results of these studies show that variation in practice patterns continue to exist. Several examples of implementation challenges are discussed with recommendations provided.
In order for audiologists working with children who are deaf or hard of hearing and their families to achieve the principles of family-centered early intervention, practice guidelines must continue to be developed, disseminated, and translated as they have a positive impact on the services provided. Researchers and clinical audiologists who deliver services must continue to collaborate to understand the "how" and "why" of implementing guidelines into practice and to identify the barriers/facilitators encountered in trying to do so.
人们普遍认为,儿童永久性听力损失的筛查和诊断必须纳入一个全面的、基于证据的、以家庭为中心的干预计划。儿科听力评估和助听器验证的临床实践指南旨在减少实践中的差异,并增加有效循证诊断和治疗方案的使用,以便实现最佳结果。为了具有价值,指南必须转化并应用于实践,并且应对其在实践中的使用情况进行持续监测。
本文介绍了两项旨在研究北美当前儿科听力学及放大技术应用情况的研究结果。
采用了同步嵌入式混合方法设计。
向提供儿科听力学服务的北美听力学家发放了电子调查问卷,350名听力学家参与了研究1,63名听力学家参与了研究2。
数据收集以定量方法为主。受访者被要求就其定量回答选项提供额外的定性文本和细节。这些定性文本在分析阶段使用,并与定量结果相结合,以帮助理解受访者在儿科放大技术方面实施最佳实践的知识、技能以及障碍/促进因素。
约70%的听力学家报告称在为儿童选配助听器时采用了最佳实践方案。尽管在过去18年里临床实践指南广为人知且使用增多,但这些研究结果表明,实践模式的差异依然存在。文中讨论了几个实施挑战的例子并给出了建议。
为了使为失聪或听力受损儿童及其家庭服务的听力学家能够实现以家庭为中心的早期干预原则,必须继续制定、传播和转化实践指南,因为它们对所提供的服务有积极影响。提供服务的研究人员和临床听力学家必须继续合作,以了解将指南应用于实践的“方式”和“原因”,并识别在尝试这样做时遇到的障碍/促进因素。