• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜肾盂成形术是治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)的一种可比较的选择吗?一项比较研究。

Is laparoscopic pyeloplasty a comparable option to treat Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)? A comparative study.

作者信息

Memon Mazhar Ali, Biyabani Syed Raziuddin, Ghirano Rajab, Aziz Wajahat, Siddiqui Khurram Mutahir

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Section Urology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 Mar;66(3):324-7.

PMID:26968286
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare laparoscopic with open pyeloplasty.

METHODS

The retrospective study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised records of patients who underwent surgical correction of ureteropelvic junction obstruction between during January 2008 and December 2012. Patients with laparoscopic pyeloplasty were placed in group 1 and those with open pyeloplasty in group 2.The groups were compared for operative time, hospital stay, perioperative complications, blood loss, duration of surgery, outcome and follow-up. Data was analysed using SPSS 19.

RESULTS

Of the 73 patients, 29(40%) were in group 1, and 44(60%) in group 2. A crossing vessel could be identified in 25(86.2%) in group 1 and in 33(75 %) in group 2. Laparoscopic procedures were associated with a longer mean operating time (p=0.04), median estimated blood loss (p<0.001) and a shorter mean hospital stay (p<0.001). Follow-up mercaptoacetyltriglycinescan was done in 21(74.5%) patients in group 1 and 23(52.2%) in group 2. Only 2(7%) patients in group 1 and 2(4.5%) in group 2 had poor response on mercaptoacetyltriglycine scan. Mean follow-up was 2.71±1.2 months. Postoperative complications were 5(13%) in group 1 and 9(20%) in group 2(p=0.141).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty was associated with shorter hospital stay, less pain and less blood loss. The efficacy in term of success rate and perioperative complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty was comparable to that of open pyeloplasty.

摘要

目的

比较腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放性肾盂成形术。

方法

本回顾性研究在卡拉奇的阿迦汗大学医院进行,纳入了2008年1月至2012年12月期间接受输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻手术矫正的患者记录。接受腹腔镜肾盂成形术的患者归入第1组,接受开放性肾盂成形术的患者归入第2组。比较两组的手术时间、住院时间、围手术期并发症、失血量、手术时长、结局及随访情况。使用SPSS 19对数据进行分析。

结果

73例患者中,第1组29例(40%),第2组44例(60%)。第1组25例(86.2%)和第2组33例(75%)可识别出交叉血管。腹腔镜手术的平均手术时间较长(p = 0.04),估计中位失血量较多(p < 0.001),平均住院时间较短(p < 0.001)。第1组21例(74.5%)患者和第2组23例(52.2%)患者接受了随访巯基乙酰三甘氨酸扫描。第i组仅例(7%)患者和第2组2例(4.5%)患者巯基乙酰三甘氨酸扫描反应不佳。平均随访时间为2.71±1.2个月。第1组术后并发症为5例(13%),第2组为9例(20%)(p = 0.141)。

结论

腹腔镜肾盂成形术住院时间较短、疼痛较轻、失血量较少。腹腔镜肾盂成形术在成功率和围手术期并发症方面的疗效与开放性肾盂成形术相当。

相似文献

1
Is laparoscopic pyeloplasty a comparable option to treat Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)? A comparative study.腹腔镜肾盂成形术是治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻(UPJO)的一种可比较的选择吗?一项比较研究。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2016 Mar;66(3):324-7.
2
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.腹腔镜肾盂成形术与开放肾盂成形术治疗儿童复发性输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻的比较
J Pediatr Urol. 2016 Dec;12(6):401.e1-401.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
3
Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.开放手术与腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的疗效比较:附49例报告
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2011 Dec;83(4):169-74.
4
[Comparison of three dimensional and two dimentional laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction].三维与二维腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;52(10):771-4.
5
Failed pyeloplasty in children: Is robot-assisted laparoscopic reoperative repair feasible?儿童肾盂成形术失败:机器人辅助腹腔镜再次修复是否可行?
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):69.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.009. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
6
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed open surgery.开放手术失败后腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗继发性输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻
J Endourol. 2007 Sep;21(9):1045-51; discussion 1051. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0414.
7
Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.机器人辅助肾盂成形术与传统腹腔镜肾盂成形术的比较
J Endourol. 2006 Oct;20(10):813-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.813.
8
Laparoscopic management of recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction following pyeloplasty: a single surgical team experience with 38 cases.肾盂成形术后复发性输尿管肾盂连接处梗阻的腹腔镜治疗:一个手术团队38例病例的经验
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 May-Jun;43(3):512-517. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0198.
9
Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗继发性输尿管肾盂连接部梗阻
J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da.
10
Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.开放肾盂成形术失败后挽救性腹腔镜肾盂成形术的长期随访
Urology. 2009 Jan;73(1):115-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.483. Epub 2008 Oct 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pyeloplasty for Primary Pelvic Ureteric Junction Obstruction: A Prospective Single Centre Study.腹腔镜与开放肾盂成形术治疗原发性肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻:一项前瞻性单中心研究
Cureus. 2020 Oct 22;12(10):e11087. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11087.
2
Surgical approaches for treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction - a systematic review and network meta-analysis.治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的手术方法 - 系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMC Urol. 2019 Nov 11;19(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0544-7.
3
Comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in adult patients.
成人肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的开放、腹腔镜和机器人辅助肾盂成形术比较。
J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):325-329. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00991-6. Epub 2019 Jun 20.