• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用远程磁导航进行心房颤动消融的疗效与安全性:1006例手术经验

Efficacy and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation: Experience from 1,006 Procedures.

作者信息

Jin Q I, Pehrson Steen, Jacobsen Peter Karl, Chen X U

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Cardiology, Shanghai Rui Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27 Suppl 1:S23-8. doi: 10.1111/jce.12929.

DOI:10.1111/jce.12929
PMID:26969219
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to assess the procedural outcomes of catheter ablation guided by remote magnetic navigation (RMN) in a large cohort of patients with paroxysmal trial fibrillation (PAF) and persistent AF (PerAF).

METHODS

A total of 726 patients (547 male, age: 58.5 ± 10.3 years) with symptomatic AF (61% PAF) were analyzed from a prospective ablation registry. Procedural parameters including pulmonary venous (PV) anatomy, left atrial (LA) volume, procedural time, ablation time, fluoroscopy time, total X-ray dose, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

One thousand and six ablation procedures were analyzed. One-third of the patients (240/726) were ablated on more than one occasion, resulting in a mean of 1.3 ± 0.6 times for the entire group. When analyzing all procedures, the mean procedural time and ablation time was 134 ± 35 minutes and 2,130 ± 1,025 seconds, respectively. The mean fluoroscopy time was 5.4 ± 3.7 minutes. Compared to PAF patients, procedural time and ablation time were significantly increased in patients with PerAF by 10% (P < 0.001) and 19% (P < 0.001), respectively. However, fluoroscopy time was not increased (5.3 ± 3.5 minutes, PAF vs. 5.6 ± 4.0 minutes, PerAF, P = 0.17). The overall complication rate was 0.6%. One PAF patient experienced cardiac tamponade. AF repeat ablations by RMN significantly reduced the procedural and ablation times when compared with their first ablation times.

CONCLUSIONS

AF ablation guided by RMN is safe as evidenced by a low complication rate. Fluoroscopy time was relatively short for both PAF and PerAF ablation.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估在一大群阵发性房颤(PAF)和持续性房颤(PerAF)患者中,远程磁导航(RMN)引导下导管消融的手术结果。

方法

从一个前瞻性消融登记处分析了总共726例有症状房颤患者(547例男性,年龄:58.5±10.3岁)(61%为PAF)。评估了包括肺静脉(PV)解剖结构、左心房(LA)容积、手术时间、消融时间、透视时间、总X线剂量和并发症在内的手术参数。

结果

分析了1006例消融手术。三分之一的患者(240/726)接受了不止一次消融,整个组的平均次数为1.3±0.6次。分析所有手术时,平均手术时间和消融时间分别为134±35分钟和2130±1025秒。平均透视时间为5.4±3.7分钟。与PAF患者相比,PerAF患者的手术时间和消融时间分别显著增加了10%(P<0.001)和19%(P<0.001)。然而,透视时间没有增加(PAF为5.3±3.5分钟,PerAF为5.6±±4.0分钟,P=0.17)。总体并发症发生率为0.6%。一名PAF患者发生心脏压塞。与首次消融时间相比,RMN进行的房颤重复消融显著缩短了手术和消融时间。

结论

RMN引导下的房颤消融并发症发生率低,证明是安全的。PAF和PerAF消融的透视时间相对较短。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation: Experience from 1,006 Procedures.使用远程磁导航进行心房颤动消融的疗效与安全性:1006例手术经验
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27 Suppl 1:S23-8. doi: 10.1111/jce.12929.
2
A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback.远程磁灌注尖端消融与手动导管灌注尖端导管消融在有无力传感反馈情况下的比较
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27 Suppl 1:S5-S10. doi: 10.1111/jce.12901.
3
Safety and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Magnetic Navigation versus Manual Conventional Ablation: A Propensity-Score Analysis.使用磁导航与手动传统消融进行心房颤动导管消融的安全性和长期结果:一项倾向评分分析。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27 Suppl 1:S11-6. doi: 10.1111/jce.12900.
4
Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic navigation system: a single-centre prospective study.使用新型三维非透视导航系统行遥控磁肺静脉隔离:单中心前瞻性研究。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Aug-Sep;106(8-9):423-32. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2013.04.008. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
5
Initial experience of a novel mapping system combined with remote magnetic navigation in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.一种新型标测系统联合远程磁导航在心房颤动导管消融中的初步经验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Dec;28(12):1387-1392. doi: 10.1111/jce.13332. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
6
Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.远程磁导管导航与手动可控鞘管引导消融治疗心房颤动导管消融的疗效和安全性:一项病例对照研究。
Europace. 2015 Feb;17(2):232-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu224. Epub 2014 Oct 21.
7
Does a patent foramen ovale matter when using a remote-controlled magnetic system for pulmonary vein isolation?使用远程控制磁系统进行肺静脉隔离时,卵圆孔未闭是否重要?
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Feb;107(2):88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
8
Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation.遥控磁导航用于房颤消融的可行性与安全性
Am J Cardiol. 2008 Dec 15;102(12):1674-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
9
Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.使用具有先进导管定位功能的接触力感应消融导管可显著减少房颤导管消融术中的透视时间和辐射剂量。
Europace. 2016 Feb;18(2):211-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv186. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
10
Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.采用远程磁导航的导管消融术对持续性和长期持续性心房颤动患者手术结果的影响
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015 Nov;44(2):197-204. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0037-x. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Heart Failure Diagnostics, Risk Prediction, and Therapeutic Strategies: A Comprehensive Review.人工智能在心力衰竭诊断、风险预测及治疗策略中的作用:一项综述
Cureus. 2025 Jul 1;17(7):e87130. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87130. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Robotics for Neuroendovascular Therapy.用于神经血管内治疗的机器人技术。
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2025;19(1). doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2024-0112. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
3
Dipole charge density mapping integrated in remote magnetic navigation: First-in-human feasibility study.
集成于远程磁导航的偶极电荷密度映射:首例人体可行性研究。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Jul 21;42:101095. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101095. eCollection 2022 Oct.
4
Utilization of steerable sheath improves the efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation guided by robotic magnetic navigation compared with fixed-curve sheath.与固定弯形鞘管相比,使用可控鞘管可提高机器人磁导航引导下的心房颤动消融效率。
Clin Cardiol. 2022 May;45(5):482-487. doi: 10.1002/clc.23801. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
5
A Review of Robotic Interventional Neuroradiology.机器人介入神经放射学述评。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 May;42(5):808-814. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6976. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Remote magnetic-guided ablation for three origins of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias with right bundle branch block and superior axis.远程磁引导消融治疗伴有右束支传导阻滞和额面电轴向上的特发性左室室性心律失常三种起源
Clin Cardiol. 2021 Mar;44(3):379-385. doi: 10.1002/clc.23546. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
7
Minimizing Radiation in the Modern Electrophysiology Laboratory.现代电生理实验室中的辐射最小化
J Innov Card Rhythm Manag. 2018 Aug 15;9(8):3265-3270. doi: 10.19102/icrm.2018.090805. eCollection 2018 Aug.
8
Procedural outcomes and learning curve of cardiac arrhythmias catheter ablation using remote magnetic navigation: Experience from a large-scale single-center study.应用远程磁导航进行心律失常导管消融的操作结果和学习曲线:来自一项大规模单中心研究的经验。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Sep;43(9):968-975. doi: 10.1002/clc.23391. Epub 2020 May 26.
9
Robotic navigation shows superior improvement in efficiency for atrial fibrillation ablation.机器人导航在房颤消融的效率方面显示出卓越的提升。
J Atr Fibrillation. 2019 Feb 28;11(5):2108. doi: 10.4022/jafib.2108. eCollection 2019 Feb-Mar.
10
Comparisons of efficacy, safety, and recurrence risk factors of paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation catheter ablation using robotic magnetic navigation system.使用机器人磁导航系统对阵发性和持续性心房颤动导管消融的疗效、安全性及复发风险因素的比较
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Apr;42(4):418-424. doi: 10.1002/clc.23156. Epub 2019 Mar 15.