Baumann Frederic, Husmann Marc, Benenati James F, Katzen Barry T, Del Conde Ian
Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute, Baptist Hospital of Miami, FL, USA.
Clinic for Angiology, University Hospital of Zurich and University of Zurich, Switzerland.
J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Jun;23(3):468-71. doi: 10.1177/1526602816637621. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
To assess the bleeding risk profile using the HAS-BLED score in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD).
A post hoc analysis was performed using data from a series of 115 consecutive patients (mean age 72.4±11.4 years; 68 men) with symptomatic PAD undergoing endovascular revascularization. The endpoint of the study was to assess bleeding risk using the 9-point HAS-BLED score, which was previously validated in cohorts of patients with and without atrial fibrillation. For the purpose of this study, the low (0-1), intermediate (2), and high-risk (≥3) scores were stratified as low/intermediate risk (HAS-BLED <3) vs high risk (HAS-BLED ≥3).
The mean HAS-BLED score was 2.76±1.16; 64 (56%) patients had a HAS-BLED score ≥3.0. Patients with PAD Rutherford category 5/6 ischemia had an even higher mean HAS-BLED score (3.20±1.12). Logistic regression analysis revealed aortoiliac or femoropopliteal segment involvement, chronic kidney disease, as well as Rutherford category 5/6, to be independent risk factors associated with a HAS-BLED score ≥3.
Patients with PAD, especially those presenting with Rutherford category 5/6 ischemic symptoms, have high HAS-BLED scores, suggesting increased risk for major bleeding. Prospective clinical validation of the HAS-BLED score in patients with PAD may help with the risk-benefit assessment when prescribing antithrombotic therapy.
使用HAS - BLED评分评估有症状的外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的出血风险概况。
对115例连续接受血管内血运重建的有症状PAD患者(平均年龄72.4±11.4岁;68例男性)的数据进行事后分析。研究终点是使用9分的HAS - BLED评分评估出血风险,该评分先前已在有和没有心房颤动的患者队列中得到验证。在本研究中,低(0 - 1)、中(2)和高风险(≥3)评分被分层为低/中风险(HAS - BLED <3)与高风险(HAS - BLED≥3)。
平均HAS - BLED评分为2.76±1.16;64例(56%)患者的HAS - BLED评分≥3.0。PAD Rutherford分级为5/6级缺血的患者平均HAS - BLED评分更高(3.20±1.12)。逻辑回归分析显示,腹主动脉 - 髂动脉或股 - 腘动脉段受累、慢性肾脏病以及Rutherford分级5/6级是与HAS - BLED评分≥3相关的独立危险因素。
PAD患者,尤其是那些表现为Rutherford分级5/6级缺血症状的患者,HAS - BLED评分较高,提示大出血风险增加。在PAD患者中对HAS - BLED评分进行前瞻性临床验证可能有助于在开具抗血栓治疗药物时进行风险 - 效益评估。