Suppr超能文献

利妥昔单抗延长给药方案或再治疗方案用于低肿瘤负荷非滤泡性惰性B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤:东部肿瘤协作组E4402方案

Rituximab extended schedule or retreatment trial for low tumour burden non-follicular indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Protocol E4402.

作者信息

Williams Michael E, Hong Fangxin, Gascoyne Randy D, Wagner Lynne I, Krauss John C, Habermann Thomas M, Swinnen Lode J, Schuster Stephen J, Peterson Christopher G, Sborov Mark D, Martin S Eric, Weiss Matthias, Ehmann W Christopher, Horning Sandra J, Kahl Brad S

机构信息

University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2016 Jun;173(6):867-75. doi: 10.1111/bjh.14007. Epub 2016 Mar 11.

Abstract

The rituximab extended schedule or retreatment trial (RESORT; E4402) was a phase 3 randomized prospective trial comparing maintenance rituximab (MR) versus a retreatment (RR) dosing strategy in asymptomatic, low tumour burden indolent lymphoma. A planned exploratory sub-study compared the two strategies for small lymphocytic (SLL) and marginal zone lymphomas (MZL). Patients responding to rituximab weekly × 4 were randomized to MR (single dose rituximab every 3 months until treatment failure) or RR (rituximab weekly × 4) at the time of each progression until treatment failure. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTTF). Patients with SLL (n = 57), MZL (n = 71) and unclassifiable small B-cell lymphoma (n = 3) received induction rituximab. The overall response rate (ORR) was 40% [95% confidence interval (CI) 31-49%; SLL ORR 22·8%; MZL ORR 52·1%]; all 52 responders were randomized. At a median of 4·3 years from randomization, treatment failure occurred in 18/23 RR and 15/29 MR. The median TTTF was 1·4 years for RR and 4·8 years for MR (P = 0·012); median time to first cytotoxic therapy was 6·3 years for RR and not reached for MR (P = 0·0002). Survival did not differ (P = 0·72). In low tumour burden SLL and MZL patients responding to rituximab induction, MR significantly improved TTTF as compared with RR.

摘要

利妥昔单抗延长给药方案或再治疗试验(RESORT;E4402)是一项3期随机前瞻性试验,比较了在无症状、低肿瘤负荷的惰性淋巴瘤中维持使用利妥昔单抗(MR)与再治疗(RR)给药策略。一项计划中的探索性子研究比较了小淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(SLL)和边缘区淋巴瘤(MZL)的这两种策略。对每周一次×4次利妥昔单抗治疗有反应的患者,在每次病情进展时随机分为MR组(每3个月单剂量利妥昔单抗,直至治疗失败)或RR组(每周一次×4次利妥昔单抗),直至治疗失败。主要终点是至治疗失败时间(TTTF)。SLL患者(n = 57)、MZL患者(n = 71)和无法分类的小B细胞淋巴瘤患者(n = 3)接受了诱导性利妥昔单抗治疗。总缓解率(ORR)为40%[95%置信区间(CI)31 - 49%;SLL的ORR为22.8%;MZL的ORR为52.1%];所有52名缓解者均被随机分组。随机分组后中位4.3年时,RR组23例中有18例出现治疗失败,MR组29例中有15例出现治疗失败。RR组的中位TTTF为1.4年,MR组为4.8年(P = 0.012);RR组至首次细胞毒性治疗的中位时间为6.3年,MR组未达到(P = 0.0002)。生存率无差异(P = 0.72)。在对利妥昔单抗诱导治疗有反应的低肿瘤负荷SLL和MZL患者中,与RR相比,MR显著改善了TTTF。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Maintenance therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.慢性淋巴细胞白血病的维持治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 4;1(1):CD013474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013474.pub2.
10
Treatment of high-risk follicular lymphoma.高危滤泡性淋巴瘤的治疗
Hemasphere. 2019 Jun 30;3(Suppl). doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000230. eCollection 2019 Jun.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验