Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO.
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar 1;42(7):774-778. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.01912. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
JCO In 2003, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group initiated a randomized phase III clinical trial (E4402) comparing two different rituximab dosing strategies for patients with previously untreated low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma. Rituximab-responsive patients (n = 299) were randomly assigned to either a retreatment rituximab (RR) strategy or a maintenance rituximab (MR) strategy. Each dosing strategy was continued until treatment failure. The primary end point of the study was time to treatment failure (TTF). In the original report, there was no difference in TTF between the two dosing strategies. Here, we report on the long-term outcomes for secondary end points of time to first cytotoxic therapy, duration of response, and overall survival (OS). At 7 years, 83% of MR patients had not required first chemotherapy compared with 63% of RR patients (hazard ratio, 2.37 [95% CI, 1.5 to 3.76]). At 7 years, 71% of MR remained in their first remission compared with 37% of RR patients. Despite the improved first remission length with MR, there was no difference in OS at 10 years (83% 84%). With mature long-term data, we confirm that prolonged maintenance rituximab does not confer an OS advantage in low-tumor burden follicular lymphoma.
JCO 2003 年,美国东部肿瘤协作组启动了一项随机 III 期临床试验(E4402),比较了两种不同利妥昔单抗剂量方案在初治低肿瘤负荷滤泡性淋巴瘤患者中的疗效。利妥昔单抗应答患者(n=299)随机分为再治疗利妥昔单抗(RR)方案或维持利妥昔单抗(MR)方案。两种方案均持续治疗直至治疗失败。研究的主要终点为治疗失败时间(TTF)。原始报告显示,两种剂量方案的 TTF 无差异。在此,我们报告次要终点的长期结果,包括首次细胞毒治疗时间、缓解持续时间和总生存期(OS)。7 年时,MR 组 83%的患者未接受首次化疗,而 RR 组为 63%(风险比,2.37[95%CI,1.5 至 3.76])。7 年时,MR 组 71%仍处于首次缓解,而 RR 组为 37%。尽管 MR 组的首次缓解时间更长,但 10 年时 OS 无差异(83% 84%)。有了成熟的长期数据,我们证实延长维持利妥昔单抗并不能为低肿瘤负荷滤泡性淋巴瘤患者带来生存优势。