Suppr超能文献

接受硫唑嘌呤和营养疗法或皮质类固醇治疗的克罗恩病患儿的复发时间

Time to Relapse in Children with Crohn's Disease Treated with Azathioprine and Nutritional Therapy or Corticosteroids.

作者信息

Hradsky Ondrej, Copova Ivana, Zarubova Kristyna, Nevoral Jiri, Bronsky Jiri

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Motol and Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, V Uvalu 84, 150 06, Prague 5, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Jul;61(7):2041-50. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4103-8. Epub 2016 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The duration of remission has been shown to be longer in patients initially treated with exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) compared to corticosteroids (CS). However, no published studies required concurrent immunomodulator [6-mercaptopurine or azathioprine (AZA)] use at the time of diagnosis.

AIMS

The aims of this retrospective study were to compare the duration of remission between patients initially treated with AZA in combination with CS or EEN and identify predictors of early relapse in these patients.

METHODS

Data from 65 newly diagnosed children with CD in clinical remission on either EEN or CS and commencing AZA at diagnosis were included. We compared duration of remission using physician global assessment and carried out Cox regression analysis to identify predictors of early relapse. Patients were followed up to the time of first relapse or for at least 12 months.

RESULTS

There were no differences in the duration of remission between patients initially treated with EEN or CS (p = 0.978). We identified younger age at diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 95 CI 0.78-0.98, p = 0.016], lower height Z score at diagnosis (HR 0.61, 95 CI 0.44-0.85, p = 0.003), involvement of the upper gastrointestinal tract (HR 2.69, 95 CI 1.27-5.66, p = 0.009), and elevated platelet count at remission (HR 1.004, 95 CI 1.001-1.008, p = 0.021) as independent predictors of early relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Neither induction regime demonstrated longer duration of remission of CD in patients treated with immunomodulators since the time of diagnosis.

摘要

背景

与使用皮质类固醇(CS)的患者相比,最初接受全肠内营养(EEN)治疗的患者缓解期更长。然而,尚无已发表的研究要求在诊断时同时使用免疫调节剂[6-巯基嘌呤或硫唑嘌呤(AZA)]。

目的

这项回顾性研究的目的是比较最初接受AZA联合CS或EEN治疗的患者之间的缓解期,并确定这些患者早期复发的预测因素。

方法

纳入65例新诊断为克罗恩病(CD)且处于临床缓解期、接受EEN或CS治疗并在诊断时开始使用AZA的儿童的数据。我们使用医生整体评估比较缓解期,并进行Cox回归分析以确定早期复发的预测因素。对患者随访至首次复发或至少12个月。

结果

最初接受EEN或CS治疗的患者之间缓解期无差异(p = 0.978)。我们确定诊断时年龄较小[风险比(HR)0.87,95%置信区间(CI)0.78 - 0.98,p = 0.016]、诊断时身高Z评分较低(HR 0.61,95%CI 0.44 - 0.85,p = 0.003)、上消化道受累(HR 2.69,95%CI 1.27 - 5.66,p = 0.009)以及缓解期血小板计数升高(HR 1.004,95%CI 1.001 - 1.008,p = 0.021)是早期复发的独立预测因素。

结论

自诊断以来,在接受免疫调节剂治疗的CD患者中,两种诱导方案均未显示出更长的缓解期。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验