Connors Jessica, Basseri Sana, Grant Amy, Giffin Nick, Mahdi Gamal, Noble Angela, Rashid Mohsin, Otley Anthony, Van Limbergen Johan
Division of Gastroenterology, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Crohns Colitis. 2017 Sep 1;11(9):1063-1070. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx060.
Exclusive enteral nutrition [EEN] is recommended as a first-line induction therapy for paediatric Crohn's disease [CD] although corticosteroids [CS] are still used commonly. Our aim was to compare short- and long-term disease outcomes of paediatric CD patients initially managed with either EEN or CS.
Medical records of newly diagnosed paediatric CD patients treated with EEN or CS as induction therapy were retrospectively reviewed. To minimise selection bias inherent in observational cohort studies, propensity analysis was carried out. Data on anthropometrics, medical history, and presenting phenotype were collected at time of diagnosis [baseline]; outcomes of interest, including medication use, hospitalisation, surgical procedures, and disease progression were assessed up to 6 years following diagnosis.
Of 127 patients reviewed, a total of 111 propensity-score matched CD patients receiving EEN [n = 76] or CS [n = 35] were analysed. By 4-12 weeks of induction therapy, 86.6% of EEN-treated patients achieved remission (Paediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index [PCDAI] ≤ 7.5) compared with 58.1% of patients in the CS-treated group [p < 0.01]. Choice of EEN over CS for induction was associated with avoidance of corticosteroids over a 6-year follow-up period. Analysis of long-term linear growth, hospitalisation, need for biologic therapy, or surgical intervention did not reveal any significant differences.
These findings suggest that EEN induction therapy is more effective in achieving early remission and is associated with long-term steroid avoidance without increased use of biologics or need for surgery.
尽管皮质类固醇(CS)仍被广泛使用,但全肠内营养(EEN)被推荐作为儿童克罗恩病(CD)的一线诱导治疗方法。我们的目的是比较最初采用EEN或CS治疗的儿童CD患者的短期和长期疾病转归。
回顾性分析以EEN或CS作为诱导治疗的新诊断儿童CD患者的病历。为尽量减少观察性队列研究中固有的选择偏倚,进行了倾向分析。在诊断时(基线)收集人体测量学、病史和临床表现型的数据;在诊断后的6年内评估包括药物使用、住院、手术操作和疾病进展等感兴趣的转归。
在127例接受评估的患者中,共分析了111例倾向得分匹配的接受EEN(n = 76)或CS(n = 35)治疗的CD患者。诱导治疗4 - 12周时,86.6%接受EEN治疗的患者达到缓解(儿童克罗恩病活动指数[PCDAI]≤7.5),而CS治疗组为58.1%[p < 0.01]。诱导治疗选择EEN而非CS与在6年随访期内避免使用皮质类固醇有关。对长期线性生长、住院、生物治疗需求或手术干预的分析未显示任何显著差异。
这些发现表明,EEN诱导治疗在实现早期缓解方面更有效,且与长期避免使用类固醇有关,同时不会增加生物制剂的使用或手术需求。