Herschel R, Hasler A, Tscholl P M, Fucentese S F
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital Balgrist, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Aug;25(8):2545-2549. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4057-6. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
Malpositioning of the femoral entry point in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) can lead to abnormal and painful patellar kinematics and loss of flexion. Determination of this point is usually performed by palpation of anatomic landmarks. Accuracy of this method has not yet been investigated. The hypotheses were: 1. palpatory method is not as accurate as fluoroscopically guided method using established radiological criteria; 2. accuracy correlates with surgical experience.
Three surgeons of varying experience defined the femoral entry point for the MPFL by palpation in ten cadaveric legs. The blinded procedures were repeated three times, and subjective difficulty of the determination was recorded. Results were documented by fluoroscopy on a true lateral radiograph. The accuracy was assessed using established radiological criteria. Surgical experience was correlated with the results, and confounding or interacting variables were assessed.
Mean deviation from the correct zone for the femoral entry point was 3.5 mm (range 0-18 mm). Twenty-nine percent of all palpatory determinations were inside the correct zone, 47 % were within 5 mm distance from the correct zone, and 23 % were further than 5 mm apart from the correct zone ("outliers"). No significant difference was found between surgeons of varying experience. No correlation was observed between subjective difficulty of the procedure and accuracy of determination.
The validity of the isolated palpatory determination of the femoral entry point in MPFL reconstruction seems to be insufficient, regardless of surgical experience. Derived from this study, fluoroscopic guidance is used in our clinic by default.
在重建内侧髌股韧带(MPFL)时,股骨入点位置不当可导致髌骨运动异常和疼痛,并导致屈曲功能丧失。该点的确定通常通过触诊解剖标志来进行。尚未对该方法的准确性进行研究。提出的假设为:1. 触诊法不如使用既定放射学标准的透视引导法准确;2. 准确性与手术经验相关。
三位经验不同的外科医生通过触诊确定了10条尸体下肢的MPFL股骨入点。盲法操作重复三次,并记录确定的主观难度。结果通过透视在真正的侧位X线片上记录。使用既定的放射学标准评估准确性。将手术经验与结果相关联,并评估混杂或相互作用的变量。
股骨入点与正确区域的平均偏差为3.5毫米(范围0 - 18毫米)。所有触诊确定中有29%在正确区域内,47%距离正确区域在5毫米以内,23%与正确区域相距超过5毫米(“异常值”)。不同经验的外科医生之间未发现显著差异。未观察到操作的主观难度与确定准确性之间的相关性。
无论手术经验如何,在MPFL重建中单纯通过触诊确定股骨入点的有效性似乎不足。基于本研究,我们诊所默认使用透视引导。