Suppr超能文献

关节镜下单束重建前交叉韧带术中透视可提高股骨隧道位置的准确性。

Intraoperative fluoroscopy during MPFL reconstruction improves the accuracy of the femoral tunnel position.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma Surgery and Sports Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center, University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Sports Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Dec;26(12):3547-3552. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4983-6. Epub 2018 May 11.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has been established as standard of care for patellofemoral instability. An anatomic femoral tunnel position has been shown to be a prerequisite for restoration of patellofemoral stability and biomechanics. However, the incidence of malpositioning of the femoral tunnel during MPFL reconstruction continues to be notable. Palpation of anatomic landmarks and intraoperative fluoroscopy are the two primary techniques for tunnel placement. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of these two methods for femoral tunnel placement.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2017, 64 consecutive patients undergoing MPFL reconstruction for patelllofemoral instability were prospectively enrolled. During surgery, the presumed femoral MPFL insertion was identified by both palpation of anatomic landmarks and using fluoroscopy, both of these points were separately documented on true lateral radiographs. They were then analysed and deviations from the Schoettle's Point were measured as anterior-posterior and proximal-distal deviations. A tunnel position within a radius of 7 mm around the Schoettle's Point was designated as an "accurate tunnel position".

RESULTS

Compared to the method of palpation, fluoroscopy led to significantly more anatomic femoral tunnel positoning (p < 0.0001). The mean proximal-distal and anterior-posterior distances between the femoral insertion site identified by palpation and the Schoettle's Point were 5.7 ± 4.5 mm (0.3-20.3 mm) and 4.1 ± 3.7 mm (0.1-20.3 mm), respectively, versus 1.7 ± 0.9 mm (0.1-3.6 mm) and 1.8 ± 1.3 mm (0.1-4.8 mm) for fluoroscopy, respectively. Using fluoroscopy, all femoral insertion sites were identified within a 7 mm radius around the centre of the Schoettle's Point. In contrast, only 52% (33) of femoral insertion sites identified by palpation were within this radius. These data were independent of patients' age, gender and BMI. No improvement in accuracy of femoral tunnel positions was detected over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The main finding of this study was that, compared to the method of palpation of anatomic landmarks, the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy in MPFL reconstruction leads to more accurate femoral tunnel positioning. Based on these results, the use of intraoperative fluoroscopy has to be recommended for femoral tunnel placement in daily surgical practice to minimize the incidence of malpositioning and to restore native patellofemoral biomechanics.

STUDY DESIGN

Level III Case-control study.

摘要

目的

重建内侧髌股韧带(MPFL)已被确立为髌股不稳定的标准治疗方法。已经证明解剖学股骨隧道位置是恢复髌股稳定性和生物力学的前提。然而,在 MPFL 重建过程中股骨隧道位置错位的发生率仍然很高。解剖标志的触诊和术中透视是两种主要的隧道放置技术。本研究旨在比较这两种方法在股骨隧道放置中的准确性。

方法

2016 年至 2017 年,前瞻性纳入 64 例接受 MPFL 重建治疗髌股不稳定的连续患者。术中通过触诊解剖标志和透视两种方法确定假定的股骨 MPFL 插入点,这两点分别记录在真正的侧位 X 光片上。然后对其进行分析,并测量与 Schoettle 点的前后和远近偏差。在 Schoettle 点周围 7mm 的半径内的隧道位置被指定为“准确的隧道位置”。

结果

与触诊方法相比,透视导致更准确的股骨隧道位置(p<0.0001)。通过触诊确定的股骨插入点与 Schoettle 点之间的近端-远端和前后距离分别为 5.7±4.5mm(0.3-20.3mm)和 4.1±3.7mm(0.1-20.3mm),而透视的距离分别为 1.7±0.9mm(0.1-3.6mm)和 1.8±1.3mm(0.1-4.8mm)。使用透视,所有股骨插入点均在 Schoettle 点中心周围 7mm 的半径内确定。相比之下,仅 52%(33 个)通过触诊确定的股骨插入点在此半径内。这些数据与患者的年龄、性别和 BMI 无关。在整个研究过程中,没有发现股骨隧道位置准确性的提高。

结论

本研究的主要发现是,与触诊解剖标志的方法相比,在 MPFL 重建中使用术中透视可使股骨隧道定位更准确。基于这些结果,建议在日常手术实践中使用术中透视进行股骨隧道放置,以尽量减少位置错位的发生率,并恢复自然髌股生物力学。

研究设计

III 级病例对照研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验