Kane-Smyth Justine, Taylor Sarah Elizabeth, García Eugenio Cillán, Reardon Richard J M
The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Vet Surg. 2016 Apr;45(3):380-5. doi: 10.1111/vsu.12454. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
To evaluate the frequency of inadvertent penetration of the digital flexor tendon sheath (DFTS) and/or distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) when using a direct endoscopic approach to the navicular bursa, and to evaluate an alternate direct approach to the navicular bursa.
Cadaveric study.
Equine cadaver limbs (n = 40 for direct; n = 12 for alternate approach).
Four surgeons performed the direct endoscopic approach to the navicular bursa on 10 limbs each. Frequencies of inadvertent synovial penetration and iatrogenic damage were compared between surgeons. Use of an alternate direct approach, adopting a straight parasagittal trajectory, was evaluated by 2 surgeons.
Inadvertent synovial penetration occurred in 45% of limbs (DFTS 37.5%; DIPJ 17.5%; and both structures 10%). Successful bursa entry was achieved on the first attempt in 45% of limbs. Significant variation in frequency of inadvertent synovial penetration was observed between surgeons (range 10-80%). Inadvertent synovial penetration did not occur when using the alternate direct technique. Iatrogenic damage to navicular bone fibrocartilage and/or deep digital flexor tendon occurred in 55% of limbs using the direct endoscopic approach and in 0% of limbs using the alternate direct approach.
Because of the considerable risk of inadvertent penetration of the DFTS and/or the DIPJ when making a direct endoscopic approach to the navicular bursa, it is advisable to investigate for inadvertent penetration when treating navicular bursa sepsis using a direct approach. The alternate direct technique may reduce the risk of inadvertent penetration; however, the view within the bursa may be restricted.
评估采用直接内镜入路至舟状滑囊时意外穿透指屈肌腱鞘(DFTS)和/或远侧指间关节(DIPJ)的频率,并评估一种至舟状滑囊的替代直接入路。
尸体研究。
马的尸体肢体(直接入路40例;替代入路12例)。
四名外科医生对10条肢体各进行一次直接内镜入路至舟状滑囊的操作。比较外科医生之间意外滑膜穿透和医源性损伤的频率。两名外科医生评估采用直矢状旁轨迹的替代直接入路的使用情况。
45%的肢体发生意外滑膜穿透(DFTS 37.5%;DIPJ 17.5%;两者均为10%)。45%的肢体首次尝试即成功进入滑囊。观察到外科医生之间意外滑膜穿透频率存在显著差异(范围为10%-80%)。使用替代直接技术时未发生意外滑膜穿透。采用直接内镜入路时,55%的肢体发生舟状骨纤维软骨和/或指深屈肌腱的医源性损伤,而采用替代直接入路时为0%。
由于采用直接内镜入路至舟状滑囊时意外穿透DFTS和/或DIPJ的风险相当大,因此在采用直接入路治疗舟状滑囊脓毒症时,建议检查是否存在意外穿透。替代直接技术可能会降低意外穿透的风险;然而,滑囊内的视野可能会受限。