Gredig Daniel, Uggowitzer Franziska, Hassler Benedikt, Weber Patrick, Nideröst Sibylle
a School of Social Work , University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland , Olten , Switzerland.
AIDS Care. 2016;28 Suppl 1(sup1):44-7. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1146212. Epub 2016 Mar 13.
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is discussed as an additional HIV prevention method targeting men who have sex with men (MSM). So far, PrEP has not been approved in Switzerland and only little is known about the acceptability of PrEP among MSM living in Switzerland. Given the slow uptake of PrEP among MSM in the USA, the objectives of the study were to investigate the acceptability for PrEP and to identify factors influencing the acceptability for this prevention method and the willingness to adopt it. During a 4-month period we conducted five focus group discussions with 23 consecutively sampled HIV-negative MSM aged 22-60 years living in Switzerland. We analyzed the data according to qualitative content analysis. The acceptability of PrEP varied considerably among the participants. Some would use PrEP immediately after its introduction in Switzerland because it provides an alternative to condoms which they are unable or unwilling to use. Others were more ambivalent towards PrEP but still considered it (1) an additional or alternative protection to regular condom use, (2) an option to engage in sexual activities with less worries and anxieties or (3) a protection during receptive anal intercourse independently of the sexual partner's protective behaviour. Some participants would not consider using PrEP at all: they do not see any benefit in PrEP as they have adopted safer sex practices and did not mention any problems with condom use. Others are still undecided and could imagine using an improved form of PrEP. The results provide a valuable basis for a model explaining the acceptability of PrEP among MSM and suggest including the personal HIV protection strategy in the considerations adopted.
暴露前预防(PrEP)作为一种针对男男性行为者(MSM)的额外艾滋病毒预防方法被讨论。到目前为止,PrEP在瑞士尚未获批,对于居住在瑞士的男男性行为者中PrEP的可接受性了解甚少。鉴于美国男男性行为者中PrEP的采用率较低,本研究的目的是调查PrEP的可接受性,并确定影响这种预防方法可接受性及其采用意愿的因素。在4个月的时间里,我们对23名年龄在22 - 60岁、连续抽样的居住在瑞士的艾滋病毒阴性男男性行为者进行了五次焦点小组讨论。我们根据定性内容分析对数据进行了分析。PrEP的可接受性在参与者中差异很大。一些人会在PrEP在瑞士推出后立即使用,因为它提供了一种避孕套的替代选择,而他们无法或不愿意使用避孕套。其他人对PrEP的态度更为矛盾,但仍认为它(1)是常规使用避孕套的额外或替代保护措施,(2)是一种可以减少担忧和焦虑进行性活动的选择,或者(3)是一种在接受肛交时独立于性伴侣保护行为的保护措施。一些参与者根本不会考虑使用PrEP:他们认为PrEP没有任何好处,因为他们已经采取了更安全的性行为方式,并且没有提到使用避孕套有任何问题。其他人仍未决定,并且可以想象使用改进形式的PrEP。研究结果为解释男男性行为者中PrEP可接受性的模型提供了有价值的基础,并建议在考虑因素中纳入个人艾滋病毒保护策略。