Nagai Koutatsu, Okita Yusuke, Ogaya Shinya, Tsuboyama Tadao
Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hyogo University of Health Sciences, 1-3-6 Minatojima, Chuo-ku, Kobe, 650-8530, Japan.
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017 Apr;29(2):231-237. doi: 10.1007/s40520-016-0554-1. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
Although several studies have reported that muscle coactivation during postural control increases with age, the effect of higher muscle coactivation on standing postural response to perturbation is unknown.
To investigate whether higher muscle coactivation affects standing postural response to perturbation in older adults.
Thirty-four community-dwelling older participants were randomly assigned either to the coactivation group (CG), where muscle coactivation was increased intentionally, or to the non-coactivation group (NCG). The participants were instructed to stand on a force plate that moved forward or backward. Electromyography data were collected from the lower leg muscles. We requested the participants in the CG to increase the activity of their tibialis anterior, and to maintain this posture during the tasks. We moved the force plate with a constant amplitude and velocity, and measured kinematic data with a camera during the tasks.
During forward transfer, the knee extension and hip flexion decreased in the CG after perturbation compared to NCG, and the trunk extension angle increased. The center of pressure (COP) displacement decreased around the peak of the movement in the CG compared to NCG. During backward transfer, ankle dorsal and knee flexion changed after perturbation in the CG compared to NCG.
Our study found that higher muscle coactivation inhibits lower limb and COP movement as well as increases trunk tilt and the risk for falls during forward perturbations. Postural control with higher coactivation appears to be inefficient for maintaining balance during the backward sway of posture.
尽管多项研究报告称,姿势控制过程中的肌肉共同激活会随着年龄增长而增加,但较高的肌肉共同激活对站立姿势对扰动的反应的影响尚不清楚。
研究较高的肌肉共同激活是否会影响老年人站立姿势对扰动的反应。
34名社区居住的老年参与者被随机分配到共同激活组(CG),即有意增加肌肉共同激活的组,或非共同激活组(NCG)。参与者被要求站在一块向前或向后移动的测力板上。从小腿肌肉收集肌电图数据。我们要求CG组的参与者增加其胫骨前肌的活动,并在任务期间保持这种姿势。我们以恒定的幅度和速度移动测力板,并在任务期间用相机测量运动学数据。
在前向转移过程中,与NCG组相比,CG组在受到扰动后膝关节伸展和髋关节屈曲减少,躯干伸展角度增加。与NCG组相比,CG组在运动峰值附近的压力中心(COP)位移减小。在后向转移过程中,与NCG组相比,CG组在受到扰动后踝关节背屈和膝关节屈曲发生了变化。
我们的研究发现,较高的肌肉共同激活会抑制下肢和COP运动,同时在前向扰动期间增加躯干倾斜和跌倒风险。在姿势向后摆动期间,较高共同激活的姿势控制似乎在维持平衡方面效率低下。