Panerai Simonetta, Tasca Domenica, Musso Sabrina, Catania Valentina, Ruggeri Federica, Raggi Alberto, Muratore Stefano, Prestianni Giuseppina, Bonforte Cinzia, Ferri Raffaele
Unit of Psychology I. C., Oasi Institute for Research on Mental Retardation and Brain Aging (IRCCS) Troina, Italy.
Unit of Neurology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital Forlì, Italy.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Feb 29;10:34. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00034. eCollection 2016.
No standard protocols are available for cognitive rehabilitation (CR) in conditions like Major or Mild Neurocognitive disorder (M-NCD or m-NCD, respectively); however, preliminary data seem to indicate that such interventions might have cost-effective beneficial effects and are free from side effect or adverse events. Three basic approaches are known: cognitive stimulation (CS), cognitive training (CT), and CR.
Aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a protocol of group intensive cognitive activation (g-ICA) in patients with both M-NCD and m-NCD; the protocol was specifically arranged in our Research Institute, based on the principles of the central role of the patient and the mediation pedagogy.
Sixteen patients with M-NCD and fifteen patients with m-NCD were enrolled, as well as eleven patients with M-NCD who were used as a control group (CG). The intervention was carried-out by a clinical neuropsychologist with daily group sessions over a period of 2 months. Neuropsychological assessment was performed at baseline and after the completion of the rehabilitative intervention.
General cognitive functioning, attention, ideomotor praxis and visual memory scores were found to be significantly increased in all patients. Beneficial and significant effects were also found for constructive praxis in M-NCD and for executive functioning in m-NCD. All areas of the language function were significantly ameliorated in m-NCD, while this happened only for verbal repetition and syntax-grammar comprehension in M-NCD. No changes were detected for long- and short-term verbal memory, which were found to be worsened in controls without activation.
Our findings seem to indicate that g-ICA might be effective in inducing beneficial changes on the general cognitive functioning and other specific functions in patients with both m-NCD and M-NCD. Moreover, the specific protocol proposed, even if susceptible of important improvement, is easy to carry out within hospital facilities and cost-effective.
在重度或轻度神经认知障碍(分别为M-NCD或m-NCD)等情况下,尚无用于认知康复(CR)的标准方案;然而,初步数据似乎表明,此类干预措施可能具有成本效益的有益效果,且无副作用或不良事件。已知三种基本方法:认知刺激(CS)、认知训练(CT)和CR。
本研究的目的是评估一组强化认知激活(g-ICA)方案对M-NCD和m-NCD患者的疗效;该方案是根据患者的核心作用和中介教学法的原则在我们的研究所专门安排的。
招募了16例M-NCD患者和15例m-NCD患者,以及11例M-NCD患者作为对照组(CG)。干预由一名临床神经心理学家进行,为期2个月,每天进行小组治疗。在基线和康复干预完成后进行神经心理学评估。
发现所有患者的一般认知功能、注意力、观念运动技能和视觉记忆评分均显著提高。在M-NCD患者的建设性技能和m-NCD患者的执行功能方面也发现了有益且显著的效果。m-NCD患者语言功能的所有方面均有显著改善,而M-NCD患者仅在言语重复和句法语法理解方面有改善。长期和短期言语记忆未发现变化,在未进行激活的对照组中发现其有所恶化。
我们的研究结果似乎表明,g-ICA可能有效地诱导m-NCD和M-NCD患者的一般认知功能和其他特定功能发生有益变化。此外,所提出的具体方案即使易于显著改进,也易于在医院设施内实施且具有成本效益。