Rui Miguel Silva, Escola Superior de Desporto e Lazer - Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Complexo Desportivo e Lazer Comendador Rui Solheiro Monte de Prado, 4960-320 Melgaço, Tel.. +351 258 809 678,
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(3):693-700. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.17.
The present scoping review focused on: i) which apps were previously studied; ii) what is the most common frequency for implementing cognitive training; and iii) what cognitive functions the interventions most focus on.
PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the search was conducted on Web of Science, PsycInfo, Cochrane, and Pubmed. From 1733 studies found, 34 were included.
it was highlighted the necessity for forthcoming investigations to tackle the methodical restrictions and disparities in the domain.
great diversity in intervention protocols was found. Incorporating evaluations of physical fitness in conjunction with cognitive evaluations can offer a more all-encompassing comprehension of the impacts of combined interventions. Furthermore, exploring the efficacy of cognitive training applications requires additional scrutiny, considering individual variances and practical outcomes in real-life settings.
本范围综述重点关注:i)之前研究过哪些应用程序;ii)实施认知训练的最常见频率是什么;以及 iii)干预措施最关注哪些认知功能。
遵循 PRISMA 指南,并在 Web of Science、PsycInfo、Cochrane 和 Pubmed 上进行搜索。在发现的 1733 项研究中,有 34 项被纳入。
突出了未来研究需要解决该领域方法上的限制和差异。
发现干预方案存在很大差异。将身体健康评估与认知评估相结合,可以更全面地了解联合干预的影响。此外,考虑到现实生活环境中的个体差异和实际结果,需要进一步研究认知训练应用程序的功效。