• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当使用重复的定指而非代词时,语义关系会对口语理解造成干扰。

Semantic Relations Cause Interference in Spoken Language Comprehension When Using Repeated Definite References, Not Pronouns.

作者信息

Peters Sara A, Boiteau Timothy W, Almor Amit

机构信息

Social and Behavioral Sciences Department, Newberry CollegeNewberry, SC, USA; Department of Psychology, University of South CarolinaColumbia, SC, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 1;7:214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00214. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00214
PMID:26973552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4772389/
Abstract

The choice and processing of referential expressions depend on the referents' status within the discourse, such that pronouns are generally preferred over full repetitive references when the referent is salient. Here we report two visual-world experiments showing that: (1) in spoken language comprehension, this preference is reflected in delayed fixations to referents mentioned after repeated definite references compared with after pronouns; (2) repeated references are processed differently than new references; (3) long-term semantic memory representations affect the processing of pronouns and repeated names differently. Overall, these results support the role of semantic discourse representation in referential processing and reveal important details about how pronouns and full repeated references are processed in the context of these representations. The results suggest the need for modifications to current theoretical accounts of reference processing such as Discourse Prominence Theory and the Informational Load Hypothesis.

摘要

指称表达的选择和处理取决于所指对象在语篇中的地位,因此当所指对象显著时,代词通常比完全重复的指称更受青睐。在此,我们报告两项视觉世界实验,结果表明:(1)在口语理解中,与代词之后提到的所指对象相比,重复的限定指称之后提到的所指对象会出现注视延迟,这反映了上述偏好;(2)重复指称与新指称的处理方式不同;(3)长期语义记忆表征对代词和重复名字的处理产生不同影响。总体而言,这些结果支持了语义语篇表征在指称处理中的作用,并揭示了在这些表征背景下代词和完全重复指称如何被处理的重要细节。结果表明有必要对当前指称处理的理论解释进行修正,如语篇突出理论和信息负荷假说。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/45ca1dcffaf5/fpsyg-07-00214-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/b2be25704c50/fpsyg-07-00214-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/bc30009cdda5/fpsyg-07-00214-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/409a2fae6396/fpsyg-07-00214-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/6f852c5af0fe/fpsyg-07-00214-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/45ca1dcffaf5/fpsyg-07-00214-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/b2be25704c50/fpsyg-07-00214-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/bc30009cdda5/fpsyg-07-00214-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/409a2fae6396/fpsyg-07-00214-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/6f852c5af0fe/fpsyg-07-00214-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5603/4772389/45ca1dcffaf5/fpsyg-07-00214-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Semantic Relations Cause Interference in Spoken Language Comprehension When Using Repeated Definite References, Not Pronouns.当使用重复的定指而非代词时,语义关系会对口语理解造成干扰。
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 1;7:214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00214. eCollection 2016.
2
Referential choice across the lifespan: why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns.一生中的指称选择:儿童和老年人为何会使用歧义代词。
Lang Cogn Process. 2014 May;29(4):391-407. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2013.766356. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
3
The effect of repetition on pronoun resolution in patients with memory impairment.重复对记忆障碍患者代词消解的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Mar;42(2):171-184. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2019.1699503. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
4
Eye movements reveal differences in children's referential processing during narrative comprehension.眼动揭示了儿童在叙事理解过程中参照处理的差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Feb;118:57-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
5
The N400 in processing repeated name and pronoun anaphors in sentences and discourse.句子和语篇中重复名词和代词回指加工过程中的N400
Brain Lang. 2017 Oct;173:52-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
6
Why do Alzheimer patients have difficulty with pronouns? Working memory, semantics, and reference in comprehension and production in Alzheimer's disease.为什么阿尔茨海默病患者在代词使用上存在困难?阿尔茨海默病中理解与产出过程中的工作记忆、语义及指称问题。
Brain Lang. 1999 May;67(3):202-27. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2055.
7
Avoiding gender ambiguous pronouns in French.避免在法语中使用性别模糊的代词。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104909. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104909. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
8
Representations underlying pronoun choice in Italian and English.代词选择所依据的表象:意大利语与英语。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Aug;75(8):1428-1447. doi: 10.1177/17470218211051989. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
9
The effects of semantic similarity on Mandarin speakers' referential expressions.语义相似性对普通话使用者指称表达的影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Nov;76(11):2579-2595. doi: 10.1177/17470218231154578. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
The frequency of referential patterns guides pronoun comprehension.指称模式的频率指导代词理解。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2023 Aug;49(8):1325-1344. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001137. Epub 2022 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The N400 in processing repeated name and pronoun anaphors in sentences and discourse.句子和语篇中重复名词和代词回指加工过程中的N400
Brain Lang. 2017 Oct;173:52-66. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
2
Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task.会话与并发视动任务之间的干扰。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):295-311. doi: 10.1037/a0031858. Epub 2013 Feb 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: time matters.语音与语义表征之间的相互作用:时间很重要。
Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;39(3):538-58. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12156. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
2
Interference between conversation and a concurrent visuomotor task.会话与并发视动任务之间的干扰。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):295-311. doi: 10.1037/a0031858. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
3
Conceptual similarity effects on working memory in sentence contexts: testing a theory of anaphora.句子语境中概念相似性对工作记忆的影响:指代消解理论的检验
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2010 Jun;63(6):1218-32. doi: 10.1080/17470210903359198. Epub 2009 Nov 4.
4
Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences.视觉世界范式的统计与计算模型:生长曲线与个体差异
J Mem Lang. 2008 Nov;59(4):475-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.006.
5
Coreference and lexical repetition: mechanisms of discourse integration.指代与词汇重复:语篇整合机制
Mem Cognit. 2007 Jun;35(4):801-15. doi: 10.3758/bf03193316.
6
Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.对图片的眼动揭示了口语单词识别过程中的短暂语义激活。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):1-14. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.1.
7
The old and thee, uh, new: disfluency and reference resolution.旧与新,呃,即话语不流畅与指称消解。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Sep;15(9):578-82. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00723.x.
8
Noun-phrase anaphors and focus: the informational load hypothesis.名词短语指代语与焦点:信息负荷假说
Psychol Rev. 1999 Oct;106(4):748-65. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.748.
9
The fractionation of working memory.工作记忆的分级
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13468-72. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13468.
10
Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.口语理解中视觉与语言信息的整合。
Science. 1995 Jun 16;268(5217):1632-4. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863.