Suppr超能文献

语音与语义表征之间的相互作用:时间很重要。

Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: time matters.

作者信息

Chen Qi, Mirman Daniel

机构信息

Center for Studies of Psychological Application and School of Psychology, South China Normal University; Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute.

出版信息

Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;39(3):538-58. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12156. Epub 2014 Aug 23.

Abstract

Computational modeling and eye-tracking were used to investigate how phonological and semantic information interact to influence the time course of spoken word recognition. We extended our recent models (Chen & Mirman, 2012; Mirman, Britt, & Chen, 2013) to account for new evidence that competition among phonological neighbors influences activation of semantically related concepts during spoken word recognition (Apfelbaum, Blumstein, & McMurray, 2011). The model made a novel prediction: Semantic input modulates the effect of phonological neighbors on target word processing, producing an approximately inverted-U-shaped pattern with a high phonological density advantage at an intermediate level of semantic input-in contrast to the typical disadvantage for high phonological density words in spoken word recognition. This prediction was confirmed with a new analysis of the Apfelbaum et al. data and in a visual world paradigm experiment with preview duration serving as a manipulation of strength of semantic input. These results are consistent with our previous claim that strongly active neighbors produce net inhibitory effects and weakly active neighbors produce net facilitative effects.

摘要

我们运用计算建模和眼动追踪技术,来探究语音和语义信息如何相互作用,从而影响口语单词识别的时间进程。我们扩展了近期的模型(Chen & Mirman,2012;Mirman、Britt & Chen,2013),以解释新的证据,即语音邻域之间的竞争会影响口语单词识别过程中语义相关概念的激活(Apfelbaum、Blumstein & McMurray,2011)。该模型做出了一个新颖的预测:语义输入会调节语音邻域对目标词加工的影响,在语义输入的中间水平产生近似倒U形模式,其中语音密度高具有优势——这与口语单词识别中语音密度高的单词通常具有劣势形成对比。通过对Apfelbaum等人的数据进行新的分析,并在一个视觉世界范式实验中得到了证实,该实验中预览持续时间作为语义输入强度的一种操纵手段。这些结果与我们之前的观点一致,即高度活跃的邻域会产生净抑制作用,而活跃度低的邻域会产生净促进作用。

相似文献

1
Interaction between phonological and semantic representations: time matters.
Cogn Sci. 2015 Apr;39(3):538-58. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12156. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
2
The neural basis of inhibitory effects of semantic and phonological neighbors in spoken word production.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Sep;25(9):1504-16. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00408. Epub 2013 May 6.
3
Phonetic categorization in phonological lexical neighborhoods: Facilitatory and inhibitory effects.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Aug;86(6):2136-2152. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02931-5. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
5
Effects of phonological and semantic deficits on facilitative and inhibitory consequences of item repetition in spoken word comprehension.
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(10):1848-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
7
Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: evidence from multiple tasks.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1385-1397. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1385.
8
Bottom-up processes dominate early word recognition in toddlers.
Cognition. 2022 Nov;228:105214. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105214. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
9
The influence of 2-hop network density on spoken word recognition.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2017 Apr;24(2):496-502. doi: 10.3758/s13423-016-1103-9.
10
Speech Perception: Phonological Neighborhood Effects on Word Recognition Persist Despite Semantic Sentence Context.
Percept Mot Skills. 2019 Dec;126(6):1047-1057. doi: 10.1177/0031512519870032. Epub 2019 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cerebellum Is Sensitive to the Lexical Properties of Words During Spoken Language Comprehension.
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2024 Aug 15;5(3):757-773. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00126. eCollection 2024.
2
Beyond the Visual Word Form Area - a cognitive characterization of the left ventral occipitotemporal cortex.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2023 Jul 28;17:1199366. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1199366. eCollection 2023.
4
It's about time! Time as a parameter for lexical and syntactic processing: an eye-tracking-while-listening investigation.
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2022;37(1):42-62. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1941147. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
5
The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm.
J Mem Lang. 2021 Dec;121. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2021.104279. Epub 2021 Jul 10.
8
Impaired Lexical Selection and Fluency in Post-Stroke Aphasia.
Aphasiology. 2019;33(6):667-688. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2018.1508637. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
9
The ventrolateral prefrontal cortex facilitates processing of sentential context to locate referents.
Brain Lang. 2016 Jun-Jul;157-158:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2016.04.006. Epub 2016 May 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Interactive activation and mutual constraint satisfaction in perception and cognition.
Cogn Sci. 2014 Aug;38(6):1139-89. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12146. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
2
Parallel Distributed Processing at 25: further explorations in the microstructure of cognition.
Cogn Sci. 2014 Aug;38(6):1024-77. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12148. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
3
Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.
J Mem Lang. 1989 Oct 1;28(5):501-518. doi: 10.1016/0749-596x(89)90009-0.
4
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
5
Effects of phonological and semantic deficits on facilitative and inhibitory consequences of item repetition in spoken word comprehension.
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Aug;51(10):1848-56. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.06.005. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
6
Temporal dynamics of activation of thematic and functional knowledge during conceptual processing of manipulable artifacts.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1274-95. doi: 10.1037/a0027626. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
8
The dynamics of lexical competition during spoken word recognition.
Cogn Sci. 2007 Feb;31(1):133-56. doi: 10.1080/03640210709336987.
9
Impulse processing: a dynamical systems model of incremental eye movements in the visual world paradigm.
Cogn Sci. 2011 Aug;35(6):1009-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01180.x. Epub 2011 May 24.
10
Function follows form: activation of shape and function features during object identification.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):348-63. doi: 10.1037/a0022840.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验