Paz-Y-Miño C Guillermo, Espinosa Avelina
Department of Biology, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, 285 Old Westport Road, North Dartmouth, MA 02747-2300, USA.
Department of Biology, Roger Williams University, One Old Ferry Road, Bristol, RI 02809, USA.
Evolution (N Y). 2009 Mar;2(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s12052-008-0096-x. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
The controversy around evolution, creationism, and intelligent design resides in a historical struggle between scientific knowledge and popular belief. Four hundred seventy-six students (biology majors =237, nonmajors =239) at a secular liberal arts private university in Northeastern United States responded to a five-question survey to assess their views about: (1) evolution, creationism, and intelligent design in the science class; (2) students' attitudes toward evolution; (3) students' position about the teaching of human evolution; (4) evolution in science exams; and (5) students' willingness to discuss evolution openly. There were 60.6% of biology majors and 42% of nonmajors supported the exclusive teaching of evolution in the science class, while 45.3% of nonmajors and 32% of majors were willing to learn equally about evolution, creationism, and intelligent design (question 1); 70.5% of biology majors and 55.6% of nonmajors valued the factual explanations evolution provides about the origin of life and its place in the universe (question 2); 78% of the combined responders (majors plus nonmajors) preferred science courses where evolution is discussed comprehensively and humans are part of it (question 3); 69% of the combined responders (majors plus nonmajors) had no problem answering questions concerning evolution in science exams (question 4); 48.1% of biology majors and 26.8% of nonmajors accepted evolution and expressed it openly, but 18.2% of the former and 14.2% of the latter accepted evolution privately; 46% of nonmajors and 29.1% of biology majors were reluctant to comment on this topic (question 5). Combined open plus private acceptance of evolution within biology majors increased with seniority, from freshman (60.7%) to seniors (81%), presumably due to gradual exposure to upper-division biology courses with evolutionary content. College curricular/pedagogical reform should fortify evolution literacy at all education levels, particularly among nonbiologists.
围绕进化论、神创论和智能设计论的争议存在于科学知识与大众信仰之间的历史斗争中。美国东北部一所非宗教性质的私立文理大学的476名学生(生物学专业 = 237人,非生物学专业 = 239人)对一项包含五个问题的调查做出了回应,以评估他们对于以下方面的看法:(1)科学课堂中的进化论、神创论和智能设计论;(2)学生对进化论的态度;(3)学生对人类进化教学的立场;(4)科学考试中的进化论内容;(5)学生公开讨论进化论的意愿。60.6%的生物学专业学生和42%的非生物学专业学生支持在科学课堂上只教授进化论,而45.3%的非生物学专业学生和32%的生物学专业学生愿意同等地学习进化论、神创论和智能设计论(问题1);70.5%的生物学专业学生和55.6%的非生物学专业学生重视进化论对生命起源及其在宇宙中的地位所提供的事实性解释(问题2);78%的受访者(包括生物学专业和非生物学专业学生)更喜欢全面讨论进化论且将人类作为其中一部分的科学课程(问题3);69%的受访者(包括生物学专业和非生物学专业学生)在科学考试中回答有关进化论的问题时没有问题(问题4);48.1%的生物学专业学生和26.8%的非生物学专业学生接受进化论并公开表达,但前者中有18.2%、后者中有14.2%私下接受进化论;46%的非生物学专业学生和29.1%的生物学专业学生不愿就这个话题发表评论(问题5)。生物学专业学生中公开和私下接受进化论的比例随着年级增长而增加,从大一学生的60.7%增至大四学生的81%,这可能是因为逐渐接触到了包含进化内容的高年级生物学课程。大学课程/教学改革应在所有教育层面强化进化论素养,尤其是在非生物专业学生中。