OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare iterative model reconstruction (IMR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) of 80-kVp abdominal dynamic CT scans obtained with a low-dose contrast agent.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A group of 27 consecutively registered patients underwent abdominal dynamic CT with an 80-kVp protocol and a low dose of contrast agent (300 mg I/kg). Another 27 patients who had previously undergone a 120-kVp protocol with filtered back projection (FBP) and a standard contrast dose (600 mg I/kg) acted as control subjects. Effective dose, image noise, CT number, and contrast-to-noise ratio were compared between the 120-kVp and 80-kVp images with FBP, HIR, and IMR. Image contrast, image noise, image sharpness, noise texture, and overall image quality were evaluated for the four protocols.

RESULTS

The effective dose of the 80-kVp protocol was lower than that with the 120-kVp protocol. The 80-kVp protocol with HIR and IMR decreased image noise by 45% and 70% compared with the 80-kVp protocol with FBP. The contrast-to-noise ratio of the 80-kVp protocol with IMR was higher than that of the 120-kVp protocol. Qualitatively, the 80-kVp protocol with IMR improved image noise more than the 120-kVp protocol did, but noise texture was worse. HIR and the 120-kVp protocol yielded similar subjective image quality.

CONCLUSION

Use of the 80-kVp protocol with HIR allowed an approximately 50% reduction in contrast dose and an approximately 40% reduction in radiation dose compared with use of the 120-kVp protocol while preserving image quality. IMR reduced image noise more than HIR with this protocol but worsened noise texture.