Qin Le, Ma ZePeng, Yan FuHua, Yang WenJie
Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin 2nd Rd, Shanghai, 200025, China.
Radiol Med. 2018 Feb;123(2):83-90. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0821-z. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
To investigate the image quality (IQ) of reduced radiation dose (RRD) renal artery CT angiography (CTA) using iterative model reconstruction (IMR) algorithm at different tube voltage.
Renal artery CTA scans were acquired with a 256-MDCT scanner on 84 patients assigned into four groups. Group 4 was scanned as standard radiation dose (SRD) group: 120 kVp, automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) technique with an Image Quality Index of 20, and filtered back projection (FBP) algorithm. Tube voltage for three RRD groups was 80 kVp in group 1, 100 kVp in group 2, and 120 kVp in group 3, and all three groups were with image quality index of 18 and IMR algorithm. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured. Subjective evaluation including diagnostic confidence, vessel artifact and intravascular contrast were performed. The effective radiation dose was recorded.
Effective radiation dose was reduced in three RRD groups compared to group 4. Intravascular contrast was significantly better in group 1 and 2 than in group 3, and artifacts decreased in group 2 than in group 3 (P < 0.05). Vascular SNR, CNR and image noise improved in three IMR groups than those in FBP group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, among three IMR groups, group 1 and 2 achieved better objective evaluation than group 3 (P < 0.05).
IMR along with RRD for renal artery CTA improved image quality compared to SRD protocol using FBP. On top of that, lower tube voltage tended to be more optimal.
研究在不同管电压下使用迭代模型重建(IMR)算法的低辐射剂量(RRD)肾动脉CT血管造影(CTA)的图像质量(IQ)。
使用256层MDCT扫描仪对84例患者进行肾动脉CTA扫描,这些患者被分为四组。第4组作为标准辐射剂量(SRD)组:120 kVp,采用图像质量指数为20的自动管电流调制(ATCM)技术,并使用滤波反投影(FBP)算法。三个RRD组的管电压分别为:第1组80 kVp,第2组100 kVp,第3组120 kVp,且这三组的图像质量指数均为18,并使用IMR算法。测量图像噪声、信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR)。进行主观评估,包括诊断信心、血管伪影和血管内对比度。记录有效辐射剂量。
与第4组相比,三个RRD组的有效辐射剂量降低。第1组和第2组的血管内对比度明显优于第3组,第2组的伪影比第3组减少(P < 0.05)。三个IMR组的血管SNR、CNR和图像噪声均优于FBP组(P < 0.05)。此外,在三个IMR组中,第1组和第2组的客观评估优于第3组(P < 0.05)。
与使用FBP的SRD方案相比,IMR结合RRD用于肾动脉CTA可提高图像质量。除此之外,较低的管电压往往更优。