Pardo Pedro J, Cordero Eduardo, Suero María Isabel, Pérez Ángel L
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2016 Mar;33(3):A248-54. doi: 10.1364/JOSAA.33.00A248.
Existing color quality indices for light sources provide broad information about different dimensions related to color quality. Color fidelity, harmony, and gamut area are concepts related to these indices, and industry requests this information. For the last few years, LED light sources have been widely used at home and at work, and now a color rendering index that solves the problem of underestimation of this type of light source is needed to provide a score of subjective assessments made by real observers related to color fidelity. In this work, this problem has been studied in two ways, theoretically and experimentally, and the results show discrepancies between the hue composition calculated theoretically using a color appearance model and hue composition evaluated by real observers. These discrepancies could originate from divergences in the color fidelity score and the subjective evaluation of the naturalness of a scene.
现有的光源颜色质量指标提供了与颜色质量相关的不同维度的广泛信息。颜色逼真度、协调性和色域面积是与这些指标相关的概念,并且行业需要此类信息。在过去几年中,LED光源已在家庭和工作场所广泛使用,现在需要一种解决此类光源低估问题的显色指数,以给出真实观察者对颜色逼真度进行主观评估的分数。在这项工作中,从理论和实验两个方面研究了这个问题,结果表明,使用颜色外观模型理论计算的色调组成与真实观察者评估的色调组成之间存在差异。这些差异可能源于颜色逼真度得分和场景自然度主观评价的差异。