• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年全护理项目中抗胆碱能药物的使用 prevalence

Prevalence of Anticholinergic Medication Use in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.

作者信息

Covington Les P, McCarrell Jamie, Hoerster Nicole S

机构信息

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (TTUHSC) School of Pharmacy, Amarillo, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Consult Pharm. 2016 Mar;31(3):168-74. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2016.168.

DOI:10.4140/TCP.n.2016.168
PMID:26975596
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the prevalence of anticholinergic medication use in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional, retrospective chart review.

SETTING

The Basics at Jan Werner PACE, Amarillo, Texas.

PARTICIPANTS

PACE participants (n = 128) and long-term care residents (n = 105) 65 years of age and older.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome was percentage of prescribed medications with anticholinergic properties and risk factors associated with prescribing: study site, gender, race, age, and creatinine clearance.

RESULTS

Anticholinergic medication prescribing was significantly lower in the PACE program (2.3% of total medications vs. 3.9%; P < 0.05) as well as total medication use (12.1 medications per subject vs. 20.8; P < 0.05 in the long-term care environment). Only the long-term care study site had a significant association with anticholinergic prescribing (odds ratio = 5.04, confidence interval 2.71-9.38). PACE participants also had lower Anticholinergic Risk Scale scores (score of 0, 60.2% PACE vs. 16.2%), reduced fall rates (23.8 per month PACE vs. 66.9), and similar hospitalization rates (5.4 per month PACE vs. 5.7).

CONCLUSION

PACE participants were prescribed fewer medications and had lower anticholinergic burden, which potentially lowers their risk of adverse effects. These data support the PACE interdisciplinary model by demonstrating the benefit of team care in appropriate use of medications. It provides a potential blueprint to organizations aimed at reducing potentially inappropriate medication prescribing in older adults.

摘要

目的

评估老年全面照护计划(PACE)中抗胆碱能药物的使用情况。

设计

横断面回顾性图表审查。

地点

得克萨斯州阿马里洛的扬·维尔纳PACE基础机构。

参与者

65岁及以上的PACE参与者(n = 128)和长期护理居民(n = 105)。

主要观察指标

主要结果是具有抗胆碱能特性的处方药物百分比以及与处方相关的风险因素:研究地点、性别、种族、年龄和肌酐清除率。

结果

PACE计划中抗胆碱能药物的处方率显著较低(占总药物的2.3%,而长期护理机构为3.9%;P < 0.05),且总药物使用量也较低(每位受试者12.1种药物,长期护理环境中为20.8种;P < 0.05)。只有长期护理研究地点与抗胆碱能药物处方有显著关联(比值比 = 5.04,置信区间2.71 - 9.38)。PACE参与者的抗胆碱能风险量表得分也较低(得分为0,PACE组为60.2%,长期护理组为16.2%),跌倒率降低(PACE组每月23.8次,长期护理组为66.9次),住院率相似(PACE组每月5.4次,长期护理组为5.7次)。

结论

PACE参与者的药物处方较少,抗胆碱能负担较低,这可能降低了他们出现不良反应的风险。这些数据通过证明团队护理在合理用药方面的益处,支持了PACE跨学科模式。它为旨在减少老年人潜在不适当药物处方的组织提供了一个潜在的蓝图。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Anticholinergic Medication Use in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.老年全护理项目中抗胆碱能药物的使用 prevalence
Consult Pharm. 2016 Mar;31(3):168-74. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2016.168.
2
Features of anticholinergic prescriptions and predictors of high use in the elderly: Population-based study.抗胆碱能药物处方的特点及老年人高使用率的预测因素:基于人群的研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Dec;28(12):1591-1600. doi: 10.1002/pds.4902. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in older adults with dementia.老年痴呆患者中潜在不适当的抗胆碱能药物使用情况。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2015 Nov-Dec;55(6):603-612. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2015.14288.
4
Potentially inappropriate anticholinergic medication use in community-dwelling older adults: a national cross-sectional study.社区居住老年人潜在不适当的抗胆碱能药物使用情况:一项全国性横断面研究。
Drugs Aging. 2015 May;32(5):379-89. doi: 10.1007/s40266-015-0257-x.
5
National Prescribing Trends for High-Risk Anticholinergic Medications in Older Adults.老年人中高风险抗胆碱能药物的国家处方趋势。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Jul;66(7):1382-1387. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15357. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
6
Temporal trends in anticholinergic medication prescription in older people: repeated cross-sectional analysis of population prescribing data.老年人抗胆碱能药物处方的时间趋势:对人群处方数据的重复横断面分析
Age Ageing. 2014 Jul;43(4):515-21. doi: 10.1093/ageing/aft199. Epub 2013 Dec 10.
7
Prevalence of the prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications at ambulatory care visits by elderly patients covered by the Taiwanese National Health Insurance program.台湾全民健康保险计划覆盖的老年患者在门诊就诊时开具潜在不适当药物的情况。
Clin Ther. 2009 Aug;31(8):1859-70. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.023.
8
Anticholinergic Drug Burden in Persons with Dementia Taking a Cholinesterase Inhibitor: The Effect of Multiple Physicians.服用胆碱酯酶抑制剂的痴呆患者的抗胆碱能药物负担:多位医生的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Mar;64(3):492-500. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14034.
9
Anticholinergic Prescribing in Medicare Part D Beneficiaries Residing in Nursing Homes: Results from a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis of Medicare Data.入住疗养院的医疗保险D部分受益人的抗胆碱能药物处方:医疗保险数据回顾性横断面分析结果
Drugs Aging. 2017 Dec;34(12):925-939. doi: 10.1007/s40266-017-0502-6.
10
Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and anticholinergic levels in the elderly: a population based study in a French region.老年人潜在不适当用药(PIMs)及抗胆碱能水平:法国某地区的一项基于人群的研究
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014 Nov-Dec;59(3):630-5. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Associated with Potentially Harmful Medication Prescribing in Nursing Homes: A Scoping Review.与养老院中潜在有害药物处方相关的因素:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Sep;23(9):1589.e1-1589.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.008. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
2
Evaluating the Impact of Medication Risk Mitigation Services in Medically Complex Older Adults.评估药物风险缓解服务对患有复杂疾病的老年人的影响。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;10(3):551. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030551.
3
Determinants of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Long-Term and Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review.
长期和急性护理环境中潜在不适当药物使用的决定因素:系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):806.e1-806.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 29.