• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长期和急性护理环境中潜在不适当药物使用的决定因素:系统评价。

Determinants of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Long-Term and Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):806.e1-806.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.005
PMID:28764876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5581209/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) are widely used in institutionalized older adults, yet the key determinants that drive their use are incompletely characterized.

METHODS

We systematically searched published literature within MEDLINE and Embase from January 1998 to March 2017. We searched for studies conducted in the United States that described determinants of PIM use in adults ≥60 years of age in a nursing home or residential care facility, in the emergency department (ED), or in the hospital. Paired reviewers independently screened abstracts and full-text articles, assessed quality, and extracted data.

RESULTS

Among 30 included articles, 12 examined PIM use in the nursing home or residential care settings, 4 in the ED, 12 in acute care hospitals, and 2 across settings. The Beers criteria were most frequently used to identify PIM use, which ranged from 3.6% to 92.0%. Across all settings, the most common determinants of PIM use were medication burden and geographic region. In the nursing home, the most common additional determinants were younger age, and diagnoses of depression or diabetes. In both the ED and hospital, patients receiving care in the West, Midwest, and South, relative to the Northeast, were at greater risk of receiving a PIM. Very few studies examined clinician determinants of PIM use; geriatricians used fewer PIMs in the hospital than other clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults, those who are on many medications are at increased risk for PIM use across multiple settings. We propose that careful testing of interventions that target modifiable determinants are indicated to assess their impact on PIM use.

摘要

背景

在机构化的老年人群体中,广泛使用了潜在不适当的药物(PIMs),但驱动其使用的关键决定因素尚未完全明确。

方法

我们系统地检索了 1998 年 1 月至 2017 年 3 月期间 MEDLINE 和 Embase 中发表的文献。我们检索了在美国进行的研究,这些研究描述了在养老院或居住护理设施、急诊部(ED)或医院中≥60 岁成年人使用 PIM 的决定因素。配对审查员独立筛选摘要和全文文章,评估质量并提取数据。

结果

在 30 篇纳入的文章中,有 12 篇研究了养老院或居住护理环境中的 PIM 使用情况,4 篇研究了 ED,12 篇研究了急性护理医院,2 篇研究了跨环境。最常用的是 Beers 标准来识别 PIM 使用,范围从 3.6%到 92.0%。在所有环境中,最常见的 PIM 使用决定因素是药物负担和地理位置。在养老院中,最常见的附加决定因素是年龄较小,以及患有抑郁或糖尿病的诊断。在 ED 和医院中,与东北地区相比,在西部地区、中西部地区和南部地区接受治疗的患者接受 PIM 的风险更高。很少有研究检查了临床医生决定 PIM 使用的因素;与其他临床医生相比,在医院中,老年病医生使用的 PIM 更少。

结论

在老年人中,那些服用多种药物的人在多个环境中使用 PIM 的风险增加。我们建议,应仔细测试针对可修改决定因素的干预措施,以评估其对 PIM 使用的影响。

相似文献

1
Determinants of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Long-Term and Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review.长期和急性护理环境中潜在不适当药物使用的决定因素:系统评价。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;18(9):806.e1-806.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
2
Interventions for preventing and reducing the use of physical restraints of older people in general hospital settings.预防和减少一般医院环境中老年人身体约束使用的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD012476. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012476.pub2.
3
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
4
Clinician-targeted interventions to influence antibiotic prescribing behaviour for acute respiratory infections in primary care: an overview of systematic reviews.针对临床医生的干预措施对基层医疗中急性呼吸道感染抗生素处方行为的影响:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 7;9(9):CD012252. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012252.pub2.
5
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
6
Care home versus hospital and own home environments for rehabilitation of older people.养老院与医院及居家环境对老年人康复的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(2):CD003164. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003164.
7
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
8
Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people.改善老年人合理使用多种药物的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 3;9(9):CD008165. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub4.
9
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
10
Potentially inappropriate medication in the elderly: a systematic review of validated explicit criteria.老年人潜在不适当用药:对有效明确标准的系统评价
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Jun;74(6):679-700. doi: 10.1007/s00228-018-2446-0. Epub 2018 Mar 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Associations between sex, race/ethnicity, and age and the initiation of chronic high-risk medication in US older adults.美国老年人的性别、种族/民族、年龄与慢性高风险药物起始使用之间的关联。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Dec;72(12):3705-3718. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19173. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Use of potentially inappropriate medication for elderly patients in tertiary care hospital of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得三级医疗医院中老年患者潜在不适当用药情况
Saudi Pharm J. 2024 Apr;32(4):102015. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102015. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
3
Geriatric Emergency Medication Safety Recommendations (GEMS-Rx): Modified Delphi Development of a High-Risk Prescription List for Older Emergency Department Patients.老年急诊用药安全推荐(GEMS-Rx):为老年急诊科患者制定高风险处方清单的改良 Delphi 法开发。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Sep;84(3):274-284. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.01.033. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
4
Co-existence of malnutrition and sarcopenia and its related factors in a long-term nursing care facility: A cross-sectional study.长期护理机构中营养不良与肌肉减少症的共存及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 11;9(11):e22245. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22245. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Assessment of potentially inappropriate medication use among geriatric outpatients in the Slovak Republic.评估斯洛伐克共和国老年门诊患者潜在不适当用药情况。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Sep 15;23(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04260-y.
6
Comparing prevalence and types of potentially inappropriate medications among patient groups in a post-acute and secondary care hospital.比较急性后期和二级护理医院患者群体中潜在不适当药物的流行率和类型。
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 15;13(1):14543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41617-0.
7
Potentially Inappropriate Medications in Older Adults-Prevalence, Trends and Associated Factors: A Cross-Sectional Study in Saudi Arabia.老年人潜在不适当用药的患病率、趋势及相关因素:沙特阿拉伯的一项横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;11(14):2003. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142003.
8
Multicenter prospective observational study on hospital pharmacist interventions to reduce inappropriate medications.关于医院药剂师干预以减少不适当用药的多中心前瞻性观察性研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Jun 29;14:1195732. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1195732. eCollection 2023.
9
Exposure to anticholinergic and sedative medication is associated with impaired functioning in older people with vertigo, dizziness and balance disorders-Results from the longitudinal multicenter study MobilE-TRA.接触抗胆碱能和镇静药物与患有眩晕、头晕和平衡障碍的老年人的功能受损有关——纵向多中心研究MobilE-TRA的结果。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Mar 3;14:1136757. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1136757. eCollection 2023.
10
Antibiotic Prescribing in Outpatient Settings: Rural Patients Are More Likely to Receive Fluoroquinolones and Longer Antibiotic Courses.门诊环境中的抗生素处方:农村患者更有可能接受氟喹诺酮类药物治疗且抗生素疗程更长。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jan 20;12(2):224. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12020224.

本文引用的文献

1
Determinants of Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use among Community-Dwelling Older Adults.社区居住老年人潜在不适当用药的决定因素
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1534-1549. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12562. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
2
A Systematic Review of the Impact of Potentially Inappropriate Medication on Health Care Utilization and Costs Among Older Adults.潜在不适当用药对老年人医疗保健利用和成本影响的系统评价
Med Care. 2016 Oct;54(10):950-64. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000587.
3
Prevalence of Anticholinergic Medication Use in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly.老年全护理项目中抗胆碱能药物的使用 prevalence
Consult Pharm. 2016 Mar;31(3):168-74. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2016.168.
4
Interventions to optimise prescribing for older people in care homes.优化养老院老年人处方的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 12;2(2):CD009095. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009095.pub3.
5
Inappropriate prescribing of preventative medication in patients with life-limiting illness: a systematic review.对患有晚期疾病患者预防性用药的不当处方:一项系统评价。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017 Jun;7(2):113-121. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-000941. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
6
Effect of hospitalization on inappropriate prescribing in elderly Medicare beneficiaries.住院治疗对老年医疗保险受益人群不适当用药的影响。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Apr;63(4):699-707. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13318. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
7
Potentially suboptimal prescribing for older veteran nursing home patients with dementia.患有痴呆症的老年退伍军人疗养院患者可能存在处方用药欠佳的情况。
Ann Pharmacother. 2015 Jan;49(1):20-8. doi: 10.1177/1060028014558484. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
8
Choosing wisely: prevalence and correlates of low-value health care services in the United States.明智选择:美国低价值医疗服务的患病率及其相关因素
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Feb;30(2):221-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3070-z. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
9
Use of medications of questionable benefit in advanced dementia.在晚期痴呆症中使用疗效存疑的药物。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Nov;174(11):1763-71. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.4103.
10
High-risk medication use by nursing home residents before and after hospitalization.住院前后养老院居民的高风险药物使用。
Med Care. 2014 Oct;52(10):884-90. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000214.