Fanari Zaher, Grove Matthew, Rajamanickam Anitha, Hammami Sumaya, Walls Cassie, Kolm Paul, Saltzberg Mitchell, Weintraub William S, Doorey Andrew J
Division of Cardiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Section of Cardiology, Carolina East Medical Center, New Bern, NC, USA.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2016 Jun;17(4):256-61. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
Accurate assessment of cardiac output (CO) is essential for the hemodynamic assessment of valvular heart disease. Estimation of oxygen consumption (VO2) and thermodilution (TD) are employed in many cardiac catheterization laboratories (CCL) given the historically cumbersome nature of direct continuous VO2 measurement, the "gold standard" for this technique. A portable facemask device simplifies the direct continuous measurement of VO2, allowing for relatively rapid and continuous assessment of CO.
Thirty consecutive patients undergoing right heart catheterization had simultaneous determination of CO by both direct continuous and assumed VO2 and TD. Assessments were only made when a plateau of VO2 had occurred. All measurements of direct continuous and assumed VO2, as well as, TD CO were obtained in triplicate.
Direct continuous VO2 CO and assumed VO2 CO correlated poorly (R=0.57; ICC=0.59). Direct continuous VO2 CO and TD CO also correlated poorly (R=0.51; ICC=0.60). Repeated direct continuous VO2 CO measurements were extremely correlated and reproducible [(R=0.93; ICC=0.96) suggesting that this was the most reliable measurement of CO.
CO calculated from direct continuous VO2 measurement varies substantially from both assumed VO2 and TD based CO, which are widely used in most CCL. These differences may significantly impact the CO measurements. Furthermore, continuous, rather than average, measurement of VO2 appears to give highly reproducible results.
准确评估心输出量(CO)对于瓣膜性心脏病的血流动力学评估至关重要。鉴于直接连续测量耗氧量(VO₂)这一该技术的“金标准”在历史上操作繁琐,许多心脏导管实验室(CCL)采用估算耗氧量和热稀释法(TD)。一种便携式面罩装置简化了VO₂的直接连续测量,使得能够相对快速且连续地评估CO。
连续30例接受右心导管检查的患者同时通过直接连续法、估算VO₂法和TD法测定CO。仅在VO₂出现平台期时进行评估。直接连续法和估算VO₂法以及TD法测定CO的所有测量均重复三次。
直接连续法测定的VO₂ CO与估算VO₂ CO相关性较差(R = 0.57;组内相关系数ICC = 0.59)。直接连续法测定的VO₂ CO与TD CO相关性也较差(R = 0.51;ICC = 0.60)。重复的直接连续法测定的VO₂ CO具有高度相关性且可重复(R = 0.93;ICC = 0.96),表明这是最可靠的CO测量方法。
通过直接连续测量VO₂计算得出的CO与大多数CCL广泛使用的基于估算VO₂和TD的CO有很大差异。这些差异可能会显著影响CO测量结果。此外,VO₂的连续测量而非平均值测量似乎能给出高度可重复的结果。