Jensen Kurt, Jørgensen Susanne, Johansen Lars
Team Danmarks Testcenter, Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Jul;87(3):202-6. doi: 10.1007/s00421-002-0616-2. Epub 2002 Apr 26.
This study evaluated an ergo-spirometry system based on mixed expired gas for gas analyses and an inspiratory based determination of flow. There were 74 paired samples of oxygen uptake (VO(2)) and related variables including pulmonary ventilation (V(E)), fractional concentrations of expired CO(2) and O(2) ( F(E)CO(2) and F(E)O(2), respectively), as well as CO(2) output (VCO(2)) which were obtained from the metabolic cart and a Douglas bag system during 22 min submaximal and 5-8 min maximal running on a treadmill. For F(E)CO(2) and VCO(2) the metabolic cart gave readings that were 2.6% and 1.8% higher and for F(E)O(2) 0.2% lower than the Douglas bag method ( P<0.05). For the metabolic cart and the Douglas bag method the coefficient of variation (CV) for repeated determinations of VO(2) was 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively. For VO(2) and V(E), there were no significant differences between the two methods and the 95% confidence interval of the difference in VO(2) was within -30 and +20 ml min(-1). The CV of the differences in VO(2) between the two systems was 2.4% and it is concluded that a metabolic cart method based on inspiratory flow rate is suitable for measurement of VO(2) and V(E) during both submaximal and maximal exercise.
本研究评估了一种基于混合呼出气体进行气体分析以及基于吸气来测定流量的呼吸气体分析系统。在跑步机上进行22分钟次最大强度跑步和5 - 8分钟最大强度跑步期间,从代谢车和道格拉斯袋系统获取了74对氧摄取量(VO₂)及相关变量的样本,这些变量包括肺通气量(V̇E)、呼出二氧化碳和氧气的分数浓度(分别为ḞECO₂和ḞEO₂)以及二氧化碳排出量(V̇CO₂)。对于ḞECO₂和V̇CO₂,代谢车给出的读数分别比道格拉斯袋法高2.6%和1.8%,而对于ḞEO₂则低0.2%(P<0.05)。对于代谢车和道格拉斯袋法,重复测定VO₂的变异系数(CV)分别为1.9%和1.8%。对于VO₂和V̇E,两种方法之间无显著差异,VO₂差异的95%置信区间在 - 30至 + 20 ml·min⁻¹ 范围内。两种系统之间VO₂差异的CV为2.4%,得出结论:基于吸气流量率的代谢车方法适用于在次最大强度和最大强度运动期间测量VO₂和V̇E。