Xie Yu, Killewald Alexandra, Near Christopher
University of Michigan.
Harvard University.
Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 2016 Jan 1;663(1):53-79. doi: 10.1177/0002716215596958.
In this chapter, we present analyses of the roles of education and occupation in shaping trends in income inequality among college-educated workers in the U.S., drawing data from two sources: (1) the 1960-2000 U.S. Censuses and (2) the 2006-2008 three-year American Community Survey. We also examine in detail historical trends in between-occupation and within-occupation income inequality for a small set of high-status professionals, with focused attention on the economic wellbeing of scientists. Our research yields four findings. First, education premiums have increased. Second, both between-occupation and within-occupation inequality increased at about the same rates for college graduates, so that the portion of inequality attributable to occupational differences remained constant. Third, scientists have lost ground relative to other similarly educated professionals. Fourth, trends in within-occupation inequality vary by occupation and education, making any sweeping summary on the roles of education and occupation in the overall increase in income inequality difficult.
在本章中,我们利用两个数据源对教育和职业在美国受过大学教育的劳动者收入不平等趋势形成过程中的作用进行分析:(1)1960 - 2000年美国人口普查数据,以及(2)2006 - 2008年为期三年的美国社区调查数据。我们还详细研究了一小部分高地位专业人员在职业间和职业内收入不平等方面的历史趋势,特别关注科学家的经济福祉。我们的研究得出了四个结论。第一,教育溢价有所增加。第二,对于大学毕业生而言,职业间和职业内不平等的增长速度大致相同,因此可归因于职业差异的不平等比例保持不变。第三,相对于其他受过类似教育的专业人员,科学家的地位有所下降。第四,职业内不平等的趋势因职业和教育程度而异,这使得难以对教育和职业在收入不平等总体增加过程中的作用进行任何一概而论的总结。