Ou Xiaoze, Zheng Guoan, Yang Changhuei
Department of Electrical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA.
Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA; Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, 06269, USA.
Biomed Opt Express. 2016 Jan 21;7(2):646-7. doi: 10.1364/BOE.7.000646. eCollection 2016 Feb 1.
When one uses USAF target to calibrate the resolution of an imaging system, the periodicity of the smallest resolvable line should be used to define the limit. However, in the original paper, the line width of the resolution target was used to characterize the resolution of our microscope system, resulting in an overestimation of the performance of the imaging system. In this erratum, we correct the parts that state incorrect resolution and also re-evaluate the performance of our micoscope.[This corrects the article on p. 1 in vol. 5, PMID: 24466471.].
当使用美国空军（USAF）靶标来校准成像系统的分辨率时，应使用最小可分辨线条的周期来定义极限。然而，在原文中，分辨率靶标的线宽被用来表征我们显微镜系统的分辨率，导致对成像系统性能的高估。在本勘误中，我们纠正了陈述错误分辨率的部分内容，并重新评估了我们显微镜的性能。[这纠正了第5卷第1页上的文章，PMID：24466471。]
