• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

知晓却无知:探索早期职业研究人员对科学领域资金及利益冲突的看法

Aware, Yet Ignorant: Exploring the Views of Early Career Researchers About Funding and Conflicts of Interests in Science.

作者信息

Tallapragada Meghnaa, Eosco Gina M, McComas Katherine A

机构信息

Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Eastern Research Group, Arlington, VA, 22201, USA.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):147-164. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9764-3. Epub 2016 Mar 15.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-016-9764-3
PMID:26979178
Abstract

This study investigates the level of awareness about funding influences and potential conflicts of interests (COI) among early career researchers. The sample for this study included users of one or more of the 14 U.S. laboratories associated with the National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network. To be eligible, respondents must have been either still completing graduate work or <5 years since graduation. In total, 713 early career researchers completed the web survey, with about half still in graduate school. Results indicate that although respondents were aware of potential funding and COI influences on their work, they remained largely ignorant of their role in addressing or managing these issues. Respondents often attributed the responsibility of addressing these issues to their supervisors. Respondents who had received some training around these issues, however, were more likely to assume more personal responsibility. Overall, this study points out that ignorance among early career researchers is less about awareness of funding and COI issues and more about taking personal responsibility for addressing these issues.

摘要

本研究调查了早期职业研究人员对资金影响和潜在利益冲突(COI)的认知水平。本研究的样本包括与国家纳米技术基础设施网络相关的14个美国实验室中一个或多个实验室的用户。符合条件的受访者必须仍在完成研究生学业或毕业不满5年。共有713名早期职业研究人员完成了网络调查,其中约一半仍在读研究生。结果表明,尽管受访者意识到潜在的资金和利益冲突对其工作的影响,但他们在很大程度上仍不清楚自己在解决或管理这些问题中所扮演的角色。受访者通常将解决这些问题的责任归咎于他们的导师。然而,接受过这些问题相关培训的受访者更有可能承担更多个人责任。总体而言,本研究指出,早期职业研究人员的无知与其说是对资金和利益冲突问题的认知,不如说是对解决这些问题承担个人责任。

相似文献

1
Aware, Yet Ignorant: Exploring the Views of Early Career Researchers About Funding and Conflicts of Interests in Science.知晓却无知:探索早期职业研究人员对科学领域资金及利益冲突的看法
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):147-164. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9764-3. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
2
Researcher views about funding sources and conflicts of interest in nanotechnology.研究人员对纳米技术的资金来源和利益冲突的看法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Dec;18(4):699-717. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9264-4. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
3
Research Integrity Practices from the Perspective of Early-Career Researchers.早期职业研究人员视角下的科研诚信实践
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Oct;21(5):1181-96. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9607-z. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
4
Meta-research: justifying career disruption in funding applications, a survey of Australian researchers.元研究:在资助申请中为职业中断辩护,对澳大利亚研究人员的调查。
Elife. 2022 Apr 4;11:e76123. doi: 10.7554/eLife.76123.
5
Where do medically qualified researchers come from?具备医学资质的研究人员都来自哪里?
Lancet. 1985 Aug 3;2(8449):262-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)90303-4.
6
Randomised study of the effects of sense of entitlement and conflict of interest contrarianism on researcher decision-making to work with the alcohol industry.随机研究权利感和利益冲突逆反主义对研究人员与酒精行业合作决策的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jun 24;24(1):1680. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18961-5.
7
What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.科研行为责任方面的指导与培训和科学家的不当行为有何关系?来自一项对美国国立卫生研究院资助科学家的全国性调查的结果。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):853-60. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c.
8
Mentoring of young professionals in the field of rheumatology in Europe: results from an EMerging EUlar NETwork (EMEUNET) survey.欧洲风湿病领域青年专业人员的指导:一项欧盟新兴风湿病网络(EMEUNET)调查的结果。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;32(6):935-41. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
9
Can lifestyle preferences help explain the persistent gender gap in academia? The "mothers work less" hypothesis supported for German but not for U.S. early career researchers.生活方式偏好能否有助于解释学术界长期存在的性别差距?对于德国的早期职业研究人员来说,“母亲工作较少”的假设得到了支持,但对于美国的早期职业研究人员则不然。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0202728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202728. eCollection 2018.
10
Of conflicts, conspiracies, red herrings, and black swans.关于冲突、阴谋、转移注意力的事物和黑天鹅事件。
Climacteric. 2015 Jun;18(3):343-5. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2015.1019244.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics Guidelines in Environmental Epidemiology: Their Development and Challenges We Face.环境流行病学中的伦理准则:制定及其面临的挑战。
Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Jun;4(2):142-155. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0138-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Conflicts of Interest, Selective Inertia, and Research Malpractice in Randomized Clinical Trials: An Unholy Trinity.随机临床试验中的利益冲突、选择性惰性与研究不当行为:邪恶三位一体。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):857-74. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9576-2. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
2
Researcher Perspectives on Conflicts of Interest: A Qualitative Analysis of Views from Academia.研究人员对利益冲突的看法:对学术界观点的定性分析
Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):843-55. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9580-6. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
3
Epidemiology of human atopic dermatitis--seven areas of notable progress and seven areas of notable ignorance.
人类特应性皮炎的流行病学——七个显著进展领域和七个显著未知领域。
Vet Dermatol. 2013 Feb;24(1):3-9.e1-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2012.01079.x.
4
Researcher views about funding sources and conflicts of interest in nanotechnology.研究人员对纳米技术的资金来源和利益冲突的看法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Dec;18(4):699-717. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9264-4. Epub 2011 Feb 19.
5
Facilitating ethical reflection among scientists using the ethical matrix.运用伦理矩阵促进科学家进行伦理反思。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Sep;17(3):425-45. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9218-2. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
6
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据?对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
7
Session 5: Nutrition communication. The role of trust in health communication and the effect of conflicts of interest among scientists.第5场:营养沟通。信任在健康沟通中的作用以及科学家利益冲突的影响。
Proc Nutr Soc. 2008 Nov;67(4):428-36. doi: 10.1017/S0029665108008689.
8
A comparison of conflict of interest policies at peer-reviewed journals in different scientific disciplines.不同科学学科的同行评审期刊利益冲突政策比较。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2007 Jun;13(2):147-57. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9011-z. Epub 2007 Jun 7.
9
Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles.营养相关科学文章的资金来源与结论之间的关系。
PLoS Med. 2007 Jan;4(1):e5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040005.
10
Emotional engagement in professional ethics.职业道德中的情感投入。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Oct;11(4):535-51. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0025-0.