• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生活方式偏好能否有助于解释学术界长期存在的性别差距?对于德国的早期职业研究人员来说,“母亲工作较少”的假设得到了支持,但对于美国的早期职业研究人员则不然。

Can lifestyle preferences help explain the persistent gender gap in academia? The "mothers work less" hypothesis supported for German but not for U.S. early career researchers.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0202728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202728. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0202728
PMID:30153285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6112653/
Abstract

Do lifestyle preferences contribute to the remaining gender gap in higher positions in academia with highly qualified women-especially those with children-deliberately working fewer hours than men do? We tested the "mothers work less" hypothesis in two samples of early career researchers employed at universities in Germany (N = 202) and in the US (N = 197). Early career researchers in the US worked on average 6.3 hours more per week than researchers in Germany. In Germany, female early career researchers with children had drastically reduced work hours (around 8 hours per week) compared to male researchers with children and compared to female researchers without children, whereas we found no such effect for U.S. researchers. In addition, we asked how long respondents would ideally want to work (ideal work hours), and results revealed similar effects for ideal work hours. Results support the "mothers work less" hypothesis for German but not for U.S. early career researchers.

摘要

生活方式偏好是否导致拥有高资质的女性(尤其是有孩子的女性)在学术领域的高层职位中仍存在性别差距——她们是否故意比男性工作时间更短?我们在德国(N=202)和美国(N=197)的两所大学中对早期职业研究人员进行了两项样本测试,以检验“母亲工作时间更短”的假设。美国的早期职业研究人员平均每周比德国的研究人员多工作 6.3 小时。在德国,有孩子的女性早期职业研究人员的工作时间大幅减少(每周约 8 小时),与有孩子的男性研究人员以及没有孩子的女性研究人员相比,而我们没有发现美国研究人员有这种影响。此外,我们询问了受访者理想的工作时间(理想工作时间),结果表明理想工作时间也存在类似的影响。结果支持德国早期职业研究人员的“母亲工作时间更短”假设,但不支持美国早期职业研究人员的这一假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb0/6112653/707b3322c87e/pone.0202728.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb0/6112653/229dcdf3c5ce/pone.0202728.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb0/6112653/707b3322c87e/pone.0202728.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb0/6112653/229dcdf3c5ce/pone.0202728.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb0/6112653/707b3322c87e/pone.0202728.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Can lifestyle preferences help explain the persistent gender gap in academia? The "mothers work less" hypothesis supported for German but not for U.S. early career researchers.生活方式偏好能否有助于解释学术界长期存在的性别差距?对于德国的早期职业研究人员来说,“母亲工作较少”的假设得到了支持,但对于美国的早期职业研究人员则不然。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 28;13(8):e0202728. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202728. eCollection 2018.
2
[The situation of early career researchers in health services research: A survey study].[卫生服务研究领域早期职业研究人员的状况:一项调查研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Jun;187:79-87. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.05.006. Epub 2024 May 29.
3
Factors associated with less-than-full-time working in medical practice: results of surveys of five cohorts of UK doctors, 10 years after graduation.医学实践中与非全职工作相关的因素:英国医生五组队列毕业10年后的调查结果
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Oct 13;14(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0162-3.
4
Gender differences in time spent on parenting and domestic responsibilities by high-achieving young physician-researchers.高成就的青年医师研究者在育儿和家务上的时间投入的性别差异。
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Mar 4;160(5):344-53. doi: 10.7326/M13-0974.
5
Parental satisfaction of U.S. physicians: associated factors and comparison with the general U.S. working population.美国医生的父母满意度:相关因素及与美国普通在职人群的比较。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Aug 27;16(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0737-7.
6
Within-couple specialisation in paid work: A long-term pattern? A dual trajectory approach to linking lives.夫妻间有偿工作的专业化:一种长期模式?一种将生活联系起来的双重轨迹方法。
Adv Life Course Res. 2015 Jun;24:47-65. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2015.02.002. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
7
The gender gap in a surgical subspecialty: analysis of career and lifestyle factors.外科亚专业中的性别差距:职业与生活方式因素分析
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Jun;130(6):695-702. doi: 10.1001/archotol.130.6.695.
8
Aware, Yet Ignorant: Exploring the Views of Early Career Researchers About Funding and Conflicts of Interests in Science.知晓却无知:探索早期职业研究人员对科学领域资金及利益冲突的看法
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):147-164. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9764-3. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
9
Faculty of Radiation Oncology 2012 trainee survey: perspectives on choice of specialty training and future work practice preferences.放射肿瘤学系2012年实习生调查:关于专业培训选择和未来工作实践偏好的观点。
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2014 Feb;58(1):125-33. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12105. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
10
Training, work, and lifestyle of transplant physicians and surgeons in Germany.
Clin Transplant. 2016 Sep;30(9):1046-52. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12786. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Balancing barriers: Family, career, and gender equality in radiation oncology and radiation research-An interdisciplinary prospective survey among the young workforce.平衡障碍:放射肿瘤学与放射研究中的家庭、职业与性别平等——一项针对年轻劳动力的跨学科前瞻性调查
Strahlenther Onkol. 2025 May 27. doi: 10.1007/s00066-025-02402-2.
2
Gender Inequalities in Citations of Articles Published in High-Impact General Medical Journals: a Cross-Sectional Study.高影响力普通医学期刊发表文章的引文存在性别不平等:一项横断面研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(3):661-666. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07717-9. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
3
The gender pay gap is smaller in occupations with a higher ratio of men: Evidence from a national panel study.

本文引用的文献

1
Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals.《自然指数》期刊所揭示的高质量研究中的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 2;13(1):e0189136. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189136. eCollection 2018.
2
Vicious circles of gender bias, lower positions, and lower performance: Gender differences in scholarly productivity and impact.性别偏见、地位较低和表现较差的恶性循环:学术生产力和影响力方面的性别差异。
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 25;12(8):e0183301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183301. eCollection 2017.
3
Gender bias in scholarly peer review.
在男性比例较高的职业中,性别薪酬差距较小:来自全国面板研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 6;17(7):e0270343. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270343. eCollection 2022.
学术同行评审中的性别偏见。
Elife. 2017 Mar 21;6:e21718. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21718.
4
Scientific Eminence: Where Are the Women?科学卓越:女性在哪里?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2016 Nov;11(6):899-904. doi: 10.1177/1745691616663918.
5
"It's tough hanging-up a call": The relationships between calling and work hours, psychological detachment, sleep quality, and morning vigor.“挂电话很难”:通话与工作时间、心理脱离、睡眠质量和早晨活力之间的关系。
J Occup Health Psychol. 2017 Jan;22(1):28-39. doi: 10.1037/ocp0000025. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
6
Women in Academic Science: A Changing Landscape.女性在学术科学界:变化中的风景。
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2014 Dec;15(3):75-141. doi: 10.1177/1529100614541236.
7
Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth After 35 Years: Uncovering Antecedents for the Development of Math-Science Expertise.35 年后对早慧青年的研究:揭示数学-科学专长发展的前因。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2006 Dec;1(4):316-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00019.x.
8
Different contexts, different effects? Work time and mental health in the United States and Germany.不同背景,不同影响?美国和德国的工作时间与心理健康
J Health Soc Behav. 2015 Mar;56(1):98-113. doi: 10.1177/0022146514568348.
9
Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later.四十年后,数学早慧男性和女性的人生轨迹和成就。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Dec;25(12):2217-32. doi: 10.1177/0956797614551371. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
10
Bibliometrics: global gender disparities in science.文献计量学:科学领域的全球性别差异
Nature. 2013 Dec 12;504(7479):211-3. doi: 10.1038/504211a.