Lachowsky Nathan John, Lal Allan, Forrest Jamie I, Card Kiffer George, Cui Zishan, Sereda Paul, Rich Ashleigh, Raymond Henry Fisher, Roth Eric A, Moore David M, Hogg Robert S
British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 15;18(3):e51. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5258.
Technology has changed the way men who have sex with men (MSM) seek sex and socialize, which may impact the implementation of respondent-driven sampling (RDS) among this population. Initial participants (also known as seeds) are a critical consideration in RDS because they begin the recruitment chains. However, little information is available on how the online-recruited seeds may effect RDS implementation.
The objectives of this study were to compare (1) online-recruited versus offline-recruited seeds and (2) subsequent recruitment chains of online-recruited versus offline-recruited seeds.
Between 2012 and 2014, we recruited MSM using RDS in Vancouver, Canada. RDS weights were used with logistic regression to address each objective.
A total of 119 seeds were used, 85 of whom were online-recruited seeds, to recruit an additional 600 MSM. Compared with offline-recruited seeds, online-recruited seeds were less likely to be HIV-positive (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.88), to have attended a gay community group (AOR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.90), and to feel gay community involvement was "very important" (AOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.93). Online-recruited seeds were more likely to ask a sexual partner's HIV status always versus <50% of the time (AOR 5.21, 95% CI 1.17-23.23), to have watched the Pride parade (AOR 6.30, 95% CI 1.69-23.45), and to have sought sex online (AOR 4.29, 95% CI 1.53-12-12.05). Further, compared with recruitment chains started by offline-recruited seeds, recruits from chains started by online-recruited seeds (283/600, 47.2%) were less likely to be HIV-positive (AOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.16-0.40), to report "versatile" versus "bottom" sexual position preference (AOR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.88), and to be in a relationship lasting >1 year (AOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06-2.56). Recruits of online seeds were more likely to be out as gay for longer (eg, 11-21 vs 1-4 years, AOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.27-3.88) and have fewer Facebook friends (eg, 201-500 vs >500, AOR 1.69, 95% CI 1.02-2.80).
Online-recruited seeds were more prevalent, recruited fewer participants, but were different from those recruited offline. This may therefore help create a more diverse overall sample. Our work has shown the value of geosocial networking apps for aiding RDS recruitment efforts, especially when faced with slow participation uptake by other means. Understanding the degree to which networks interact will be an important next step in confirming the efficacy of online RDS recruitment strategies.
科技改变了男男性行为者(MSM)寻求性接触和社交的方式,这可能会影响该人群中应答驱动抽样(RDS)的实施。初始参与者(也称为种子)是RDS中的关键考虑因素,因为他们开启了招募链条。然而,关于通过网络招募的种子如何影响RDS实施的信息很少。
本研究的目的是比较(1)通过网络招募的种子与通过线下招募的种子,以及(2)通过网络招募的种子与通过线下招募的种子的后续招募链条。
2012年至2014年期间,我们在加拿大温哥华使用RDS招募男男性行为者。使用RDS权重和逻辑回归来实现每个目标。
总共使用了119名种子,其中85名是通过网络招募的种子,以额外招募600名男男性行为者。与通过线下招募的种子相比,通过网络招募的种子感染艾滋病毒呈阳性的可能性较小(比值比[OR]为0.34,95%置信区间[CI]为0.13 - 0.88),参加同性恋社区团体的可能性较小(调整后比值比[AOR]为0.33,95% CI为0.12 - 0.90),并且认为参与同性恋社区“非常重要”的可能性较小(AOR为0.16,95% CI为0.03 - 0.93)。通过网络招募的种子更有可能总是询问性伴侣的艾滋病毒感染状况,而不是询问时间少于50%的情况(AOR为5.21,95% CI为1.17 - 23.23),观看过同性恋骄傲大游行(AOR为6.30,95% CI为1.69 - 23.45),以及在网上寻求性行为(AOR为4.29,95% CI为1.53 - 12.05)。此外,与由线下招募的种子开启的招募链条相比,由网络招募的种子开启的招募链条中的招募对象(283/600,47.2%)感染艾滋病毒呈阳性的可能性较小(AOR为0.25,95% CI为0.16 - 0.40),报告“通用型”而非“被动型”性体位偏好的可能性较小(AOR为0.56,95% CI为0.35 - 0.88),处于恋爱关系超过一年的可能性较小(AOR为1.65,95% CI为1.06 - 2.56)。网络招募种子的招募对象更有可能公开出柜的时间更长(例如,11 - 21年与1 - 4年相比,AOR为2.22,95% CI为1.27 - 3.88),并且脸书好友较少(例如,201 - 500人与超过500人相比,AOR为1.69,95% CI为1.02 - 2.80)。
通过网络招募的种子更为普遍,招募的参与者较少,但与通过线下招募的种子不同。因此,这可能有助于创建一个更加多样化的总体样本。我们的工作显示了地理社交网络应用程序在协助RDS招募工作方面的价值,特别是在其他方式参与度较低的情况下。了解网络互动的程度将是确认在线RDS招募策略有效性的重要下一步。